Because in spanish (I'm from Costa Rica and live in Mexico) salvador means savior, and in cristianism is believed that Jesus came to save the world so El salvador would mean the savior, the spanish called that piece of land like that, like many others are named for saints
I know the names of all of the countries so it really helped to narrow it down. I went through the list of countries in my head and El Salvador was the only one that really related to any of the figures listed.
Salvador/Savior very commonly tends to refer to Jesus or at least to a messiah figure. I could make the connection quite easily, but I can understand why it wouldn't be so obvious to some.
I had the Jesus one on a recent quiz....like the redeemer in Brazil, there are a number of 'savior' references. #10 got me....what on earth can live to 10,000 years? It's like the nonillion question!
Looks like you were on for a super fast time there as well! I only got that last one because I knew roughly how long the others all live, and the Greenland shark is the longest-lived vertebrate (up to ~500 years)
Yeah, I was doing pretty good, had some weird coincidental knowledge on this....like 'whip' and Playstation from my kids, I was pretty sure but not positive on the fusion. Tomorrow I'll be back to form and be in the middle of the LB pack....😒
9/10 for me today. Strong first half, then it got tricky. Got the fusion question wrong because I went by their atomic numbers and 1+1=2, but apparently it's a lot more complicated than that 😂 Took a while to remember the black swans and El Salvador, and only got the glass sponge through process of elimination
Just noticed that I can go back and do the quizzes I missed, the comments are answering so many questions I had about an overall leaderboard and cheating.
It made me laugh so hard that more people thought black swans are fictional than Australian! I’ve seen a lot of them in NZ and Aus - but also they are the example we were taught in philosophy to demonstrate the limits of inductive reasoning: Europeans inferred that all swans where white, but seeing on black swan in Australia falsified that belief.
I knew of black swans because a local park owns a few, but I only knew where they are native because I hyper-fixated on swans, geese, and ducks not long ago. ADD causes some weird interests.
I have issues with question 6. I did some looking up of articles and facts and I found out that indeed you can end up with a helium-4 atom from fusing 4 hydrogen-1 atoms while releasing 2 positrons and things like this happen in the Sun, but it's quite an oversimplification. And it doesn't include the fact that there are different isotopes of hydrogen and different isotopes of helium and they appear in intermediate steps of the fusion, as it happens for example in stars.
My answer was 2, because the reaction in most common research is between deuterium (hydrogen-2) and tritium (hydrogen-3) and you need only those two atoms of hydrogen, you just need the correct hydrogen isotopes.
Somebody on Quora meanwhile insists that the answer is 3, because helium-3 is a perfectly stable isotope of helium, with two protons and one neutron.
In general it seems like this question needed to be more specific and there wasn't enough context given.
You need the weak force to get the neutrons though. Or some free neutrons. It's complicated. Agree the question is probably a bit too specific and ever so slightly wrong, especially for a quiz which I think we all approach as a speed test.
To be a real pedant, the fusion question is a bit wrong. It's right, 4 hydrogen nuclei but it's just a bit more complicated and isn't worded right. And yes you're correct I'm being pedantic because I got it wrong despite studying nuclear physics. Saw 2, knew the atomic number was 2, clicked 2. Should've thought. So maybe ignore my saltiness haha.
I thought of El Salvador and still didn't choose Jesus. I guess because "Jesus" isn't in the country name. I thought about it for some time, too. That shows you how dumb I am.
Ouch my worst score ever! I knew 3 but missed my intended answer for the Sony PS. Pretty sure even if I hadn't marked the wrong answer it still would have been my worst score.
The Jesus question was poorly worded imo. Question was framed like the answer was 'Jesustan' or 'Jesustania' or some such. Better phrasing might be sth like, 'a country named in the honour of' etc
Not my best day, 6/10 but 1st on my leaderboard, perhaps the only one....
I am sure that the existence of el salvador is well known.
And salvador-savior-salvager-whatever isn't the most complex linguistic connection.
But who could connect the two and did not just guess?
Turns out it's El Salvador but at least I got it right, though unintentional.
I miss a lot of questions just from rushing through them, and I’m not even in a friend group so I don’t know why I hurry so much.
My answer was 2, because the reaction in most common research is between deuterium (hydrogen-2) and tritium (hydrogen-3) and you need only those two atoms of hydrogen, you just need the correct hydrogen isotopes.
Somebody on Quora meanwhile insists that the answer is 3, because helium-3 is a perfectly stable isotope of helium, with two protons and one neutron.
In general it seems like this question needed to be more specific and there wasn't enough context given.
Based on my basic understanding of physics, it takes 2 hydrogen atoms to get two protons to make one helium atom. What am I missing?
I stunk but I didn't stink bad enough to matter.
Thanks.
I didn't thought of El Salvador.