According to the Global Slavery Index, there are 18 million people living in slavery in India. This is four times greater than the number of slaves in the United States at the peak of American slavery.
167
About 10 million slaves were brought from Africa to the New World. The vast majority went to Brazil and the Caribbean. Only about 6% ended up in what is now the United States.
168
Parkinson's law of triviality, also known as "bikeshedding", argues that organizations give disproportionate weight to trivial issues because they are easy to understand. For example, if a proposed solar power plant includes plans for an employee bike shed, then there will be a lots of debate about the bike shed while the complicated engineering issues are overlooked.
169
Don't worry. If the United States and Russia have a nuclear war, it won't kill the entire human race. The concept of a nuclear winter is almost certainly flawed science.
170
The word gymnasium comes from the Greek word γυμνός meaning "nude". Greek athletes often did not wear clothes where they were training.
Americans didn't own much of colonial Brazil and the Caribbean. For the duration of the transatlantic slave trade after 1781 when the U.S. became independent, the European colonial powers traded with the U.S. but did not want it making inroads in their colonies, getting economic strength and spreading ideas of independence.
The US was still relatively wild and considered a backwater...and we got out of the slave trade early on, 1800-something while Jefferson was president I think.
Portugal was by far the biggest trader in enslaved people. Nothing to do with the USA. Nevertheless, the "only" in the fact downplays it a bit, the numbers should have been roundly zero.
Some of these "facts" seem to have a political slant. Did anybody claim every human would die solely because of a nuclear winter? The wikipedia article looks like it was written by people who spent a lot of time refuting stuff nobody really said.
I agree that Carl Sagan may not have claimed 100% human extinction but he did claim that a nuclear winter would happen. And it was a popular enough concept for me to know what it was as a high-schooler. It's also not something that would happen.
While I never expected everyone to die from nuclear winter, I certainly thought it was something that could happen and would likely kill most people in the world. this is one of the facts that I found most interesting
Having gotten a good look now at what things were like with fairly low level supply chain disruptions during the pandemic (toilet paper anyone??), a nuclear winter wouldn't be necessary for there to be millions of dead from some kind of nuclear attack. An EMP blast in the atmosphere could put huge areas back into the stone age, and it's not pretty to think what would happen to our modern society, especially in the cities.
If it's possible that some small percentage of the human population could survive the aftermath of an all-out worldwide nuclear conflict, then what are we waiting for?
Given a population in India of ~1.34 billion, 18 million slaves is a little over 0.01% of the population.
According to some of the data on this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States - in around 1860, about 12.5% of the population of the US were slaves.
So I'm not really sure why fact 166 is framed the way it is. Of course, it's still terrible, and maybe I'm missing the point?
The fact that it's a smaller percentage of the population doesn't matter. There are still more people living in slavery there now. The point is that people seem to think slavery is all but gone in the world, and yet one of the largest countries in the world is still using the practice and large numbers of people live in conditions that they shouldn't have to.
I don't know about you but 18 million Slaves is not a small number even in a country with 1.4 billion people. We might have a lot of people but that doesn't means we have sympathy or compassion for humans. India's case is very different, we had a huge population from the very beginning and It's really disheartening to say as an Indian but it's our lack of proper education and political guidance since independence which couldn't control our overwhelming population.
Here's a YouTube video about child labour in India which is actually kind of slavery but we don't realise that
Then that aint true. I have travelled all across India. Never seen any case. Especially considering I traveled with my IPS (police officer) friend. He was in charge of this matter for some years. He only got less than 100 cases in about 4 yrs.
Nuclear Bombs would cause tsunamis. It would cause the global warming issue to be temporarily solved. But a Nuclear will eventually die. Humans are capable of anything.
Just update the Indian Slavery fact. Its outdated. And offensive to some people.
According to some of the data on this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States - in around 1860, about 12.5% of the population of the US were slaves.
So I'm not really sure why fact 166 is framed the way it is. Of course, it's still terrible, and maybe I'm missing the point?
Here's a YouTube video about child labour in India which is actually kind of slavery but we don't realise that
The Dark secrets behind your favourite make-up products
Global Slavery Index assumes 11 Million Slaves for India in 2023, but this apparently also contains child labour, forced begging and forced marriage.