People used to be bad at running the marathon. The gold medalist at the 1948 Olympics won with a time of 2:34:51, a time regularly bested by modern high school athletes.
352
Live Aid was a pair of concerts held in London and Philadelphia in 1985 to raise money for Ethiopian famine relief. Unfortunately, much of the money raised by the concerts ended up in the hands of the brutal communist regime that had caused the crisis in the first place. Some of the money was used to buy weapons.
353
Nowhere in the nursery rhyme does it ever say that Humpty Dumpty was an egg.
354
"Dunbar's Number" is the theoretical number of people with which you can have an active social relationship. It is estimated to be between 100 and 250 people. Societies that exceed this limit are often said to have issues with social trust and cohesion.
355
Many people believe that, in the early United States, only white male landowners over the age of 21 could vote. This isn't strictly true. The original Constitution left eligibility up to the states. African-Americans and women were eligible to vote in many states prior to the Constitutional amendments that gave them the vote universally.
Regarding #353, it's alleged that Humpty Dumpty was originally in reference to a cannon that fell off the wall of Colchester Castle during the English Civil War. As far as I know it was Lewis Carroll who popularised the idea of it being about an egg, but don't quote me on that.
It's not that people were bad at running marathons. It's that the sport evolved: better training, better dietary regimes, better understanding on how to keep stamina, better organization.
Nowadays, if the temperature is 70ºF (21.1ªC) or higher, the marathon can be suspended on medical grounds. This was unheard of back in the day. For example, in the 1904 Olympics:
The temperature for the marathon was reported as 100ªF (37.8ªC), in humid St. Louis.The path taken was composed by dirt roads.There was only one water station: an untreated well.
And these things were set by James Sullivan (the marathon organizer, today in the US Track and Field Hall of Fame), to prove his most radical ideas on the human resistance. There's a brillant video on the matter by the great Jon Bois.
That's the most extreme example, but it proves the ignorance in the topic that prevailed then.
People absolutely used to be bad at running marathons. (By modern standards). Now they are better. Better training was the method in which this improvement happened. Although better conditions played a part as well.
Today, there are thousands of amateur athletes who could easily beat the best runners at the time. Yeah, they were bad. And this comes from someone who is generally very appreciative of athletic accomplishments of a previous era.
You do realize that was one race, right? It was some bizarre and cruel experiment on the effects of dehydration, and the winner only won because he was injected with rat poison mixed with brandy, and his support team had to carry him across the finish line, while he kicked his lets back and forth like he was still running. It was cruel, and definitely not the standard.
You think that the rat poison mixed with brandy was actually helpful? Today's top runners also run in hot humid conditions and do quite well. Take the top runner in 1896 and put them in the Boston Marathon. They wouldn't finish in the top 100.
Olympics 2021 - Peres Jepchirchir - Kenya 2:27:20: So does this mean women are 'Bad' at running, or in reality the sport of marathon running for women is a fairly modern sport. Similarly the times in the men's Olympics were not up to todays standards when the race was first held and has progressed since then, as have all sports. You might as well say people were bad at high jump, long jump, shot putt, 100m etc etc. I think saying people used to be bad at running is not a good example.
There was one Lydia Taft in Uxbridge in Town Meetings. New Jersey allowed voting up until 1807. And Kentucky was on paper allowing any women to vote from 1838 onwards, but few actual voters existed. While yes not explicitly prohibited by the Constitution itself, nearly every state in every meaningful way prohibited voting to women, and or limited it to landowners and or whites.
So if your point was to say the right existed on paper I get that, showing how it wasn't in the founding-est document. But for all practical and execution based history it was a ban on voting for these groups, and this question may raise the assumption that amongst them, voting was common, when it was in fact nearly unheard of.
Well stated - today a lot of people are annoyed with the "black lives matter" movement saying that it's 2021 and America has moved beyond racism and find it difficult to relate to what the outcry all about. It just like 1776 when it was written all men where created equal - however we know there is no way the author of that statement actually meant "all men were created equal", EVERYBODY knows that black is not, and never was included in the "all" for far too many people with influence and power who now love to say "all lives matter".
Thomas Jefferson wrote "all men are created equal," and he actually wrote abolition of slavery in the Constitution but removed it because he feared losing southern states' support.
#351 - Please take the word "bad" out. 2:35 is still an excellent marathon time today, although not a gold medal performance. Fewer than 1% of marathon runners (of which there are a lot more now than there were a hundred years ago) ever break 3 hours.
Also, high schoolers rarely race the marathon distance, so it seems silly to include the statement that they regularly run faster. They may run faster equivalent times at 5k, 2 miles and the mile, but that is not the same thing.
2:35 is elite -- It's better than 90% percentile for the men's under-35s at the Boston Marathon. There are Olympic performances worse than that every year, just not medal contenders.
Bad runners can't run marathons in 3 hrs. Anyone that can achieve that is a very good runner. It is illogical to conclude that because the very best are even better now, that the best then were bad. I think you could argue that they weren't living up to their potential, but in comparison to the average schmuck, they weren't bad runners.
Nowadays, if the temperature is 70ºF (21.1ªC) or higher, the marathon can be suspended on medical grounds. This was unheard of back in the day. For example, in the 1904 Olympics:
The temperature for the marathon was reported as 100ªF (37.8ªC), in humid St. Louis.The path taken was composed by dirt roads.There was only one water station: an untreated well.
And these things were set by James Sullivan (the marathon organizer, today in the US Track and Field Hall of Fame), to prove his most radical ideas on the human resistance. There's a brillant video on the matter by the great Jon Bois.
That's the most extreme example, but it proves the ignorance in the topic that prevailed then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon_world_record_progression
Trivia: Phil Collins performed in both cities that day.
There was one Lydia Taft in Uxbridge in Town Meetings. New Jersey allowed voting up until 1807. And Kentucky was on paper allowing any women to vote from 1838 onwards, but few actual voters existed. While yes not explicitly prohibited by the Constitution itself, nearly every state in every meaningful way prohibited voting to women, and or limited it to landowners and or whites.
So if your point was to say the right existed on paper I get that, showing how it wasn't in the founding-est document. But for all practical and execution based history it was a ban on voting for these groups, and this question may raise the assumption that amongst them, voting was common, when it was in fact nearly unheard of.
in fact it would be nice to have a list of sources for these Interesting Facts across the board, seems like good practice
Also, high schoolers rarely race the marathon distance, so it seems silly to include the statement that they regularly run faster. They may run faster equivalent times at 5k, 2 miles and the mile, but that is not the same thing.
2:35 is elite -- It's better than 90% percentile for the men's under-35s at the Boston Marathon. There are Olympic performances worse than that every year, just not medal contenders.