Interesting Facts - Page 9

41
Muphry's Law states that anytime you criticize someone's spelling or grammar, there will be a spelling or grammar mistake in your criticism.
42
In the year 1920, there were about 5,000 Amish people. By 2017, their numbers had grown to 318,400. At these growth rates, the Amish population will reach more than 11 million by the end of century. Invest in farmland.
43
Hofstadter's Law states: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
44
John D. Rockefeller was the first person to have a net worth in excess of $1 billion U.S. dollars. His company, Standard Oil, had a monopoly on the U.S. oil industry.
45
Arsenic trioxide was sometimes known as "inheritance powder" because of its common use as a poison. Rates of poisoning decreased after the invention of the Marsh Test in 1836 which made it possible to detect arsenic in human remains.
71 Comments
+9
Level 67
Apr 22, 2018
Is this new, or have I just never seen this before. It's cool nevertheless!
+13
Level 68
Aug 3, 2021
I'm afraid there is a spelling mistake in #41. Take that, Murphy's Law!
+16
Level 79
Feb 6, 2022
its allmost like that's was the entire point...
+8
Level 65
Apr 6, 2024
It’s spelld “almost”
+6
Level 68
Oct 28, 2024
yu spelled the word spelled wrong
+3
Level 37
Mar 31, 2025
you spelt you incorrecly smh 🤦‍♂️
+3
Level 48
Oct 7, 2025
goe bak tu skul yew spld incorrectly rong
+2
Level 49
Jul 23, 2022
@McKenzieFam, I’m afraid that there’s a grammar mistake in your sentence
+1
Level 55
Oct 13, 2022
It was two sentences actually
+1
Level 18
May 30, 2023
McKenzieFam That's intentional(I hope).
+30
Level 71
Apr 23, 2018
Sputid fakts
+22
Level 63
Apr 25, 2018
Eye tthank ewe spellt thaht rong.
+18
Level 71
Apr 30, 2018
noeh, i doent thenck soeh !
+12
Level 63
May 4, 2018
Ye, ewer prawbublee write.
+12
Level 63
Sep 28, 2018
Joejoex ur funnnee ef thaye dohnt goe write ohvur ewer hed
+13
Level 45
Nov 14, 2018
O mee gaud peepel, wood ewe yist sppel fengs write?
+5
Level 78
May 21, 2020
Noe. Nyevyer!
+2
Level 82
Jul 27, 2020
So did you.
+2
Level 32
Mar 19, 2021
Wee willll nevah sppell iht rite!
+2
Level 47
May 20, 2021
owe nowe, eye hayt sppelng writ!
+2
Level 39
Jun 17, 2021
Oeh! Soh jaubesxe beygan hier?
+2
Level 66
May 24, 2022
Stoopids, it has to be critism
+2
Level 58
Jun 26, 2022
Wy dz nobdy cen raït cretly ?
+2
Level 63
Mar 6, 2023
Ubselitlee nubedi cin reth dhz convurzazhjun
+2
Level 33
Jul 19, 2023
dzis cunviersazchioan ejis reaelyy baed slpeleat!

noen oef yeall’ cen eaven slpel curectalaly!

+2
Level 26
Jan 28, 2025
Nice language y'all created!
+3
Level 20
May 19, 2020
no faktcs is raly intrstng dum dumb
+2
Level 61
Apr 7, 2021
oeh reuly... pruev eit!
+2
Level 26
May 25, 2023
I am afraid there is a mistake in your sentence
+34
Level 33
May 13, 2018
Like if you found the error in "Muphry's" instead of "Murphy's".
+3
Level 64
Aug 28, 2018
yeah
+10
Level 72
Oct 7, 2019
Muphry's is spelled correctly, it's 'anytime' witch is wrong.
+4
Level 66
May 18, 2020
*which
+2
Level 73
Sep 15, 2020
Muphry's Law right there, ahahahaha
+2
Level 37
Mar 31, 2025
It's hahahaha not ahahahaha lol you speld it wrong!!!
+11
Level 73
Feb 16, 2021
I think that was on purpose.
+3
Level 60
May 22, 2023
I thought that that was just his name...
+5
Level 73
Jun 29, 2018
If they couldn't detect poisonings until after the invention of the test, how do they know that incidences decreased?
+1
Level 45
Nov 14, 2018
murders and missing cases probably decreased dramatically after finding many cases of poisoning.
+3
Level 73
Jan 30, 2019
People die all of the time and it was far more common to die young, with no readily apparent cause, in the early C19 than we are used to now. I find it hard to believe that there would have been so many murders by poisoning that it made a noticeable difference in death statistics after the introduction of the test.

I wasn't being completely serious anyway, just pointing out what seems to be a logical flaw. I'm sure there are valid reasons why they believe this which I haven't considered.

+1
Level 41
Jun 18, 2021
More people were being killed by old lace after the test...
+1
Level 40
Mar 30, 2023
I imagine when the test was new, a lot of dead people tested +, but more obvious is simple logic that murders would decrease.
+3
Level 64
Jul 18, 2018
The Amish population projection assumes growth rates will stay linear, which is never the case for any population.
+1
Level 70
Dec 4, 2019
At this rate there will be over 21 million Amish in a hundred years. and 1,3 billion by the year 2200 ..... wow!
+9
Level 27
Nov 26, 2018
lol that Murphy's law one
+11
Level 73
Jan 30, 2019
yu've misspelled Muphry's ;-P
+1
Level 90
Feb 21, 2019
yeah
+5
Level 73
Jul 31, 2019
read my post again...
+1
Level 37
Mar 31, 2025
you spelled you've wrogn!!
+9
Level 49
Nov 9, 2019
The Amish should relocate to California; there is plenty of farmland, the weather is perfect, and they are used to functioning without electricity.
+2
Level 59
Oct 2, 2020
They live in traditionally german areas, by which I mean places german immigrants moved to. From Pennsylvania to Iowa, all along the rust belt. Plenty of farmland for them, and good quality fruits and vegetables for us.
+3
Level 70
Dec 4, 2019
My favourite Murphy's Law is ......."You never find a lost article until you replace it."
+1
Level 68
Apr 3, 2020
lol so true
+1
Level 71
Oct 6, 2023
*Muphrees
+1
Level 67
Sep 9, 2020
How did we know it was arsenic before the Marsh test?
+1
Level 77
Feb 3, 2021
If Hofstadter's law applies, then the excess time needed would have to tend to a specific value, because otherwise people would never get anything finished, and in fact they do. Therefore, the excess time needed after referring to Hofstadter's law over and over again in a struggle to find out when one will finish will be smaller every time you refer to it. Thus, if you have two similar tasks, and you estimate when you will be finished with it, but also when you will be finished with reference to Hofstadter's law, and then actually do the task and time yourself doing it, then you have three values from which you can calculate for every task, when you will finish it, even with reference to infinite iterations of applying Hofstadter's law. Thus, you will be able to say when you finish the second task.
+1
Level 77
Feb 3, 2021
But the problem with that is, that we would have to apply Hofstadter's law once again, which we cannot do, for infinity plus one doesn't work. Thus I have proven that given the condition that people actually finish stuff at some point, Hofstadter's law cannot work.
+1
Level 39
Jun 18, 2021
*Murphy
+2
Level 55
Oct 13, 2022
joke missed
+1
Level 40
Mar 30, 2023
I spent months deciding to like Acer11818 but i haven't decided yet to make a decision if i am ready to decide . . . i guess i never will
+2
Level 41
Jun 18, 2021
#41 "Muphry's" - nice approach!
+1
Level 48
Aug 26, 2021
Is "Muphry's Law" an example of a Persian flaw, I wonder.
+1
Level 56
Jan 17, 2023
:p
+1
Level 69
Oct 28, 2023
I ran Hofstadter's law on my computer and got a StackOverflowException.
+1
Level 21
Apr 10, 2024
Update on the Amish population: it is now over 367,000 (about 50 thousand extra people in 7 years) this means that the prediction may not be as far-fetched as it may seem.
+1
Level 48
Dec 25, 2024
Interesting
+1
Level 40
Mar 7, 2025
Fact #41 is mispelled.
+1
Level 37
Mar 31, 2025
You didn't spell misspelled correcly
+1
Level 56
Sep 17, 2025
You werent even abel to spel correctly!
+1
Level 53
May 1, 2025
There's a fun fact, that unfortunately I don't know exactly, but that goes something like as long as the first and last letter of a word are correct the brain can work out what it should be even if the letters in-between are mixed-up. There's probably a bit more to it than that, but you get the drift
+1
Level 58
Nov 2, 2025
Aye qan't beleev ghakt ghordi won iz mispelled...