Suspect it's down to a lot of users of the website being American. I'm not American but I'm guessing their media made a big deal about Fischer so that even people with no interest in chess in America will have heard of him. Meanwhile Carlsen is Norwegian so he's only a name people will be familiar with if they play or watch chess.
Fischer was world news in many ways. He is part of history. He is known by non-chess enthusiasts, whereas Carlsen probably not as much. I'm not American and I'm not Norwegian.
Because Fisher is the best known chess player of all-time, and his notoriety goes beyond chess. Unless you play online chess or go on Chess Youtube, where would you hear about Magnus?
What he means is that the fool's mate can also be achieved by the white side, but it takes 3 moves, as follows:
1. e3 f6
2. c3 g5
3. Qh5#
Of the 29 possible moves white can make on move 2, 6 would prevent the fool's mate option from being available (f3, g4, Nf3, Qh5+, Ke2, Be2), so c3 could be 22 other moves as well, but white's fastest possible checkmate is on move 3, after black's moves of f6 and g5.
Elo rating indicates how strong you are compared to your opponents. It is not absolute, but relative measure, because you gain or lose rating points by wins or losses. If marathon would have same rating system, you wouldn't record times but wins or losses against other runners.
World ranking is based on Elo ratings of current players. Magnus Carlsen is number 1 in that ranking. He has also achieved the highest Elo rating of all time. It means that he has succeeded among his peers better than anyone else before him (but there is also inflation among Elo ratings over time). So, both statements are true about Carlsen.
Great quiz! I'd love if you made some more chess-themed quizzes, maybe about top players throughout history or openings or something like that. Great start though!
Garry Kasparov was World Champion for 15 years meaning the number of months he was champion for would be around 180. Emanuel Lasker was World Champion for 27 years (although that included WW1)- around 324 months.
Exactly. Just because you are the highest rated player doesn't mean you are the World Champion. I know it's confusing to non-chessers, but, as you said, Lasker was WC for longer than 255 months, and Kasparov was for less than that. Lasker was 1894-1921, and Kasparov was 1985-2000. Though, partly due to WW1, there was no World Championship from 1910-1921. However, if there had been one in 1911/12/13, he still might have won, and still, even had he lost, would have been WC for longer than Kasparov. This obviously helped extend the reign significantly, but he still would hold the crown. The fact is that Lasker was the World Champion for just over 323 months and Kasparov was for just under 180 months.
Pretty good quiz! I play chess a lot and my elo’s 1600. The hardest parts in this quiz were trying to spell “Zugzwang” and guessing every large Latin country I can think of cus I didn’t know where Capablanca was from lol
2. g4 Qh4#
You may be thinking of Scholar's Mate.
1. e3 f6
2. c3 g5
3. Qh5#
Of the 29 possible moves white can make on move 2, 6 would prevent the fool's mate option from being available (f3, g4, Nf3, Qh5+, Ke2, Be2), so c3 could be 22 other moves as well, but white's fastest possible checkmate is on move 3, after black's moves of f6 and g5.
World ranking is based on Elo ratings of current players. Magnus Carlsen is number 1 in that ranking. He has also achieved the highest Elo rating of all time. It means that he has succeeded among his peers better than anyone else before him (but there is also inflation among Elo ratings over time). So, both statements are true about Carlsen.