This is a ridiculous list. Two cases where one of the books is a part of another "book" listed (Lion, Witch and Wardrobe/Narnia; Hamlet/Complete Works of Shakespeare), two that have no answer (!!)- would be better if you stripped the list down to 50 or so, said that all the books appeared on the list/meme in question and gave less time.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is part of the Chronicles of Narnia series. It, and the other six in the series, were all originally published as stand-alone books, even if today they're sometimes packaged together in a single volume.
And Moses, Daniel, Ezra, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Paul, James, Jude... and we're still not to half of the authors. I suppose you could say they were all ghost writing for God...
No it wasn't. Even devout believing Christians who know what they are talking about know this. I'm not being disrespectful I'm trying to save you from looking silly. This is just flat out wrong and we know it to be wrong.
The earliest written references to the four Gospels attribute them to the authors they are associated with today. John to John the Evangelist, Mark as the account of Peter (Mark being his scribe), Luke to Luke and Matthew to Matthew. There are many of such citations from the late second / early third century and later.
I thought it was a great quiz, but I did used to work in a bookshop, so that makes it easier. I got 65/80 and there were another half dozen that were on the tip of my tongue but my brain froze.
Coming from Canada, I was surprised as to how much Canadian lit there was (Anne of Green Gables, Life of Pi, The Handmaid's Tale). It seems Canadians do produce good novels after all!
I'm fairly well-read and I only got 45. I would've gotten 46 if I remembered that Thackeray was spelled with an "ay" at the end rather than just a "y." Still, I'm okay with my result, because I tend to stick to the classics and not knowing the author of books like The Lovely Bones is fine by me.
Nobody asked me, but my personal vote for most over-rated book is "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance". Never has a book gotten so much mileage out of a great title. Many people claim to like it. Fewer have read it. Even fewer can explain it (probably because it's mostly nonsense).
I read it and I really liked it! I cant remember much about it though, cause it was about 20 years ago. I can almost only remember that a teacher asked his class to look at a coin and keep looking at it and write everything they see. And another part about how input goes through several filters of the mind. Things about perception.
Other than that I dont remember much so, I can't tell you much about what is was about, but I remember the things I felt reading it. (atleast parts of the book could be the rest wasnt interessing) I found it very interesting, refreshin and inspiring if i remember correctly. Completely different than other books, quite weird, but touching subjects I was allready interested in
thoughI feel like I am the only one in my country that has ever heard of it. Well at least one other person, cause I think I got it via a friend of my sister. I wonder where that book went... maybe I should reread it. no idea if I just loaned it or if it is in possesion ( I have got wayy too many books, and I give a lot of them away very often, but they still take up an entire room (and are scattered around all the other rooms expect, usually.. the kitchen haha)
Missed 18 for a 78% pass rate, which surprisingly beats 98% of takers!
Did The Guardian really list Hamlet separately from the Complete Works? Old Billy Shakes is the only name with an extraneous final letter that you require to type in. Ironically some of the ones I couldn't remember are ones I've actually read (Curious Incident, Capt Corelli).
I think I'd be just fine doing without Dan Brown. That said, I think overall it's a good list. Is it exactly the list I would have chosen? No, but on balance, not bad.
My quizbowl knowledge wasn't good enough for 5 points - I only got 51. I maybe should have gotten Zola, Toole, and Khaled Hosseini, but it still wouldn't have been enough. Shocking that I am not good enough! :)
No Haruki Murakami, Peter Carey, Mickhail Bulgakov, Thomas Pynchon, Henry Miller or Anthony Burgess. But somehow Dan Brown is on here, JK Rowling and Jane Austen 3 times!? Also, it's amazing how a movie series can give credence to a series of books. When I was younger, The Lord of the Rings was only considered serious reading by mega-nerds and people who smoked too much pot.
Every true JetPunker should read 'Extreme Cosmos' by Bryan Gaensler.......... this book is the ultimate non-fiction book regarding the extremes on Earth and the Universe:......... did you know the Sun loses between 4 and 5 Million tons of mass EVERY SECOND!
Dickens is good. But six books in a list of only 100 seems a bit excessive. (As well as Shakespeare and C.S. Lewis each getting the same book on there twice.) Especially when Twain is left out entirely.
The Guardian is crazy. Some of these books are utter rubbish and some all time great books are missing. The list was distinctly slanted towards snobby books. Catcher in the Rye was dreadful.
Where are Homer's Iliad and Odyssey? Where is Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics? Where is Dante's Divine Comedy? Where is Machiavelli's Prince? Well, this seems to be a very poor list to me.
Perhaps zoom out and consider: does everyone need or want to have access to Homer, Machiavelli, or Dante? I love me some Homer, but as one of the earliest to give us the major Western archetypes, anything after will reflect some of that pretty well. As for Machiavelli, are we all studying to overthrow our political enemies all the time? Are we, in fact, princes? And Aristotle: Christian and Ancient Greek thought got married beautifully by Sts. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and even Dante. While I agree with you that these works are still somewhat relevant, I'm not sure the average perhaps Needs them, ya know?
Heavens... around 10 of these were originally written in a language other than English, mostly Russian and French. I know this simply reflects the literature Guardian readers are most likely to be exposed to, but it's so bizarre to me how few translated works are well-known by Anglophones
It would however be a completely different story in countries without very strong national literatures and incredibly low rates of literary translation.
In my experience, on the whole no. Also have the most cursory idea of the history of non-English-speaking countries, and very little curiosity about either.
No Hemingway, Twain, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, H.G. Wells, Robert Louis Stevenson (Treasure Island), Herman Melville (Moby Dick), Mary Shelley (Frankenstein), Jack London, Arthur Conan Doyle, or Agatha Christie?
Oh dear: there are some very poor choices on this list. Remember: The Guardian is a media entity; as such, its list was designed to attract attention and clicks as much as anything else.
Reddit? Of all the places on the internet, I feel like Reddit is one of the few that still has large communities for readers. Any book or author you're into, you can find a subreddit for. And BookTok is certainly a thing, plenty of book recs on Instagram too. (We can debate about the recs they give, but they certainly aid people in finding books.) IMO, it's not a question of "readers" reading less; people who grew up reading will remain avid readers. And there are always going to be people who don't enjoy reading, if they have better things to do with their time, that doesn't bother me.
What I'm more concerned about is younger generations, especially Gen Alpha, and their engagement with books. Because the content you get reflects your interests, and if people aren't actively looking for those topics, threads, videos, it doesn't register in their feed. And of course AI slop and brainrot is going to be more readily available to kids than things that are educational or enriching.
Other than that I dont remember much so, I can't tell you much about what is was about, but I remember the things I felt reading it. (atleast parts of the book could be the rest wasnt interessing) I found it very interesting, refreshin and inspiring if i remember correctly. Completely different than other books, quite weird, but touching subjects I was allready interested in
Although The Great Gatsby is right up there with it.
Did The Guardian really list Hamlet separately from the Complete Works? Old Billy Shakes is the only name with an extraneous final letter that you require to type in. Ironically some of the ones I couldn't remember are ones I've actually read (Curious Incident, Capt Corelli).
It's very important for students!
No HG Wells, though...
What I'm more concerned about is younger generations, especially Gen Alpha, and their engagement with books. Because the content you get reflects your interests, and if people aren't actively looking for those topics, threads, videos, it doesn't register in their feed. And of course AI slop and brainrot is going to be more readily available to kids than things that are educational or enriching.