This quiz is based on original research. I tended to err on the side of skepticism, leaving out cities with poor historical records or that didn't rise to the level of a city. Obviously this involves some subjectivity.
In some cases, people claim that the history of a city goes back thousands of years because someone found a bone in a cave or something. Clearly, that's not what we mean by urban settlement. Please don't make the same mistake when arguing for your city to be included.
In any case, this quiz can never be considered fully authoritative. I did my best.
LOL...I know you're kidding, but in addition to still being in the same urban area as Rome, a quick search shows "many villas were constructed there in the early 1st century AD," so I still think it should count! ;)
I see what you did, QM - took Lisbon off the quiz and then deleted my comment. What do you have against Vatican City, not like it's Belgium or something! ;)
Yes, it was founded as a new capital for the Abbasids not far from Ctesiphon, which was itself founded by the Sasanians near Seleucia, which was founded by the Macedonians to replace Babylon... so, a long story of foundations in this region lol.
I personally was incredibly surprised by pyongyang, knowing that the south has historically been way more populated as well as its distance from the "start of civilization" in Mesopotamia
I was surprised by the exclusion of Tunis (having been there recently), but turns out that too was founded in the 700s next door to Carthage, not on the same site - although it's all one now.
It's old enough, the original Philadelphia was founded in Hellenistic times. But it's continuity is unproven at best, most likely abandoned several times.
Some Wikipedia sections:
Amman's importance declined by the mid-8th century after damage caused by several earthquakes rendered it uninhabitable. /.../ The occupation of the Citadel Hill by the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem is so far based only on interpretations of Crusader sources. /.../ During the Ayyubid period, the Damascene geographer al-Dimashqi wrote that Amman was part of the province of al-Karak, although "only ruins" remained of the town.
That was a good lesson regarding the Eastern Asia cities- Beijing 1045 BC, Hanoi 257 BC, Pyongyang 194 BC, Seoul 18 BC, thanks for sharing the research & the quiz
My look into it suggests that the town was basically destroyed in 518 by an earthquake and was rebuilt(/possibly relocated slightly) sometime later in the 6th century, maybe 535.
I was hoping that a North American city would sneak in. Unfortunately, although there was a settlement where Guatemala City is now, it was not continuously inhabited.
Seoul should not be included here if you haven't included Amman for not being a continuous urban settlement.
Considering the year BC 18 you've cited, I believe that you're considering Baekje's Wirye City and the modern Seoul as a same city. Though the presumed site of Wirye is within modern Seoul's borders today, this only came to be true in 1963. The site of Wirye was abandoned after being razed in 475 (though some artifacts suggest the area being used for a 100 more years).
The modern city of Seoul was built in 1394 as Hanyang/Hanseong (or in 1067, if you count the non-capital one too) in a completely different location North of the Han river, only to expand into where Wirye was in Modern times.
Those two cities are not the same.
The site of Wirye City was occupied by nothing but orchards and rice fields until the 1970s minimum.
Heck, at least the artifacts from Rabbath Ammon are found from where Amman's Old City stands today. Seoul and Wirye are completely different locations!
I just now fully realize they were all supposed to be capital cities... only typed a few non capital ones, but I did. I typed Istanbul and Ankara in one go and tried Alexandria too and a couple of Chinese ones. And several Italian ones. Hm and some others haha
It's a different city compared to when the pyramids were built. Cairo is relatively new-ish in that it was built by the Caliphate somewhere around 700~AD
In some cases, people claim that the history of a city goes back thousands of years because someone found a bone in a cave or something. Clearly, that's not what we mean by urban settlement. Please don't make the same mistake when arguing for your city to be included.
In any case, this quiz can never be considered fully authoritative. I did my best.
Some Wikipedia sections:
Amman's importance declined by the mid-8th century after damage caused by several earthquakes rendered it uninhabitable. /.../ The occupation of the Citadel Hill by the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem is so far based only on interpretations of Crusader sources. /.../ During the Ayyubid period, the Damascene geographer al-Dimashqi wrote that Amman was part of the province of al-Karak, although "only ruins" remained of the town.
Considering the year BC 18 you've cited, I believe that you're considering Baekje's Wirye City and the modern Seoul as a same city. Though the presumed site of Wirye is within modern Seoul's borders today, this only came to be true in 1963. The site of Wirye was abandoned after being razed in 475 (though some artifacts suggest the area being used for a 100 more years).
The modern city of Seoul was built in 1394 as Hanyang/Hanseong (or in 1067, if you count the non-capital one too) in a completely different location North of the Han river, only to expand into where Wirye was in Modern times.
Those two cities are not the same.
The site of Wirye City was occupied by nothing but orchards and rice fields until the 1970s minimum.
Heck, at least the artifacts from Rabbath Ammon are found from where Amman's Old City stands today. Seoul and Wirye are completely different locations!
Fun fact: Belgrade has been razed over 40 times
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dushanbe#History
Dushanbe first appeared in the historical record in 1676 AD, so I'd say it was probably founded around that time, although it could have been earlier.