Technically, none of these "questions" are questions, but statements taken from Wikipedia. What islabonita means is, the Columbus statement doesn't directly refer to him - or anyone - as a person.
I imagine the following Wikipedia description: "Genghis Kahn, who emerged from a fusion between Genghis Khan and OliverKahn, is known as the most aggressive entity in the history of mankind."
I find it weird that standard Jetpunk procedure is to accept "Caesar" for Julius (and others) but not "Khan" for Genghis (and others), given they are both titles. (For the record, I think no titles should be accepted except for Christ since most people don't even know that's a title)
For dear old Julius, it was, in fact, his name. The title came later and was a reference to him. The only-known-by-his-title-guy is Augustus (Octavian).
Unfortunately, that's a pretty common misconception in the US. In fact, she leveraged her original exotic/erotic appeal into a life of service and innovation...but she couldn't bring it to the US because segregation and racism made it impossible for her to do so...even though she had served the US military during WWII as a courier.
I know this may be controversial... but I think that statement says a lot about Washington compared to some of the other Founding Fathers. Looking at his Wikipedia page, his view of slaves changed significantly between the beginning of his life, when he was just like any other Southerner, and the end of his life, where he fully committed to abolition and freed his slaves. He also, relative to other people of his time, didn't necessarily see black people as inferior; he employed black doctors and soldiers and said that black people deserve to be educated and given citizenship.
Compare to Jefferson, who had an belief that black people were inherently inferior, had a relationship with Sally Hemmings, and sold most of his slaves in his will to pay off his debts. I'll grant that Jefferson's views were also complicated, but at the end of the day I feel like he was a slaveowner through and through who would have never been able to do what Washington did.
Well, the good news is you probably know them better now. Supposedly, using an individual's name shortly after learning it will help you remember it in the future.
Compare to Jefferson, who had an belief that black people were inherently inferior, had a relationship with Sally Hemmings, and sold most of his slaves in his will to pay off his debts. I'll grant that Jefferson's views were also complicated, but at the end of the day I feel like he was a slaveowner through and through who would have never been able to do what Washington did.