Germany has an obligation to take in Syrian refugees, because of… history, can’t they go to neighboring countries?, why do Germany and other EU countries have to be the ones to take them in?
Did it occur to you to find out how many did go to neighboring countries? Nearly 2/3 of Syrian refugees were taken in by Turkey. In the end, they're just people looking for an opportunity to live their lives in physical and financial security, same as you. Some of them thought their best option was to request asylum in the EU. They basically just asked. Is that so wrong?
It is wrong that we accept so many. it is fine for them to try and do what's best for them and what's best for us is to not let them in. Especially if Germany and France will take a huge proportion whereas Poland and Hungary take basically none
You're insinuating that believing Epstein committed suicide is as ridiculous as believing in a flat Earth or that the Mossad planned 9/11? More than a bit of a stretch.
chromosomes and genes are parts of DNA, but the human genome is the entire set of all genes expressed in human DNA, this number is in the billions and that's why it was a scientific achievement to sequence it. So gene and chromosome are not really correct answers.
As an analogy: if the human genome is a book, then a chromosome is a chapter, a gene is a sentence and DNA is ink and paper. These are not the same things.
To be honest, I think accepting DNA is reasonable. So would be "genes" (but only plural).
It's specific enough that they obviously knew what the question was referring to. It's not perfectly accurate, but if someone said "they sequenced the all the human genes" or "they sequenced all the human DNA" people would clearly understand what they're talking about.
"Genom" on the other hand, should not be accepted.
Funniest part of the disease was that a known football/soccer player Dele Adebola had to actually release a brief statement that he did not 'ave it. ;)
Global financial crisis would be a much better answer than the US-centric term which before just looking it up I had never before heard used in my country (Australia).
Hard to separate the impact of Facebook from other social media. I agree that social media as a whole is a net negative for humanity - I say, as I write this on a minor social media platform. (Yes, any online comment section qualifies as social media.)
America/American are two words that mean different places or people depending on where you are and who you're asking. It's very much a regionalism.
It tends to be Spanish speakers from south of the United States --- ie Latin America --- that would use the term "America" or "American" as a catch all for anyone from the Western Hemisphere. Meanwhile, people from Canada or the US or even much of Europe would reserve the term "America" or "American" as associated with the United States and its people.Canadians often don't like being confused for Americans.
Like any cross cultural dialogue, you have to be cognizant of who you're talking to. Some regionalisms can be taken quite offensively, while others aren't all that serious --- just silly debate. With language, it's best to give someone the benefit of the doubt and learn a new perspective than stomp one's foot down in insistent protest.
Didn't find anything worth mentioning in six of the 19 years since the beginning of the decade? (Loved the quiz. It's just that my OCD brain would have preferred one event for each year...)
That statement about F-book is the official story but not the real one. Anyone who's done any coding can appreciate that the likelihood of a single person writing hundreds of thousands of lines of code in a single weekend in their dorm room is essentially nil.
african american refers to the ethnic group of american descendants of slavery, barack obama is half white & half kenyan which makes him the first president of african descent but not african american as that refers to a specific ethnic group
Except those terms mean different things that what's accepted. Sequencing the entirety of DNA implies a far larger accomplishment and sequencing genes implies a smaller one
So not a thought for the people who lost their homes in the first place then?
Or was it a dig at Angela Merkel?
(I'm joking, please don't label me a conspiracy theorist)
It's specific enough that they obviously knew what the question was referring to. It's not perfectly accurate, but if someone said "they sequenced the all the human genes" or "they sequenced all the human DNA" people would clearly understand what they're talking about.
"Genom" on the other hand, should not be accepted.
(don't get me wrong, i'm not critisizing, just find it hilarious at times).
If QM wants to go with what appears to be a predominately, if not exclusively, US term please allow types-ins along the lines of those listed above.
Though, other languages can use unitedstatesian
It tends to be Spanish speakers from south of the United States --- ie Latin America --- that would use the term "America" or "American" as a catch all for anyone from the Western Hemisphere. Meanwhile, people from Canada or the US or even much of Europe would reserve the term "America" or "American" as associated with the United States and its people.Canadians often don't like being confused for Americans.
Like any cross cultural dialogue, you have to be cognizant of who you're talking to. Some regionalisms can be taken quite offensively, while others aren't all that serious --- just silly debate. With language, it's best to give someone the benefit of the doubt and learn a new perspective than stomp one's foot down in insistent protest.
african american refers to the ethnic group of american descendants of slavery, barack obama is half white & half kenyan which makes him the first president of african descent but not african american as that refers to a specific ethnic group
Come on. He's African-American. There's virtually no debate against it.