Featured Quizzes
User Quizzes
Create Quiz
Data and Charts
Word Search
Flash Cards
Badges and Games
About JetPunk
Message Board
Random Quiz
Dark Mode
15 Important Charter Cases - Statistics
General Stats
- This quiz has been taken 0 times
- The average score is 0 of 15
Answer Stats
| Significance | Decided | Case | % Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Established the framework for analyzing equality rights claims under section 15 | 1989 | Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia | 0%
|
| Recognized that criminal laws related to sex work violated section 7 by increasing risks to the safety and security of sex workers | 2013 | Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford | 0%
|
| Elucidated the principle of substantive equality as section 15 requires the government to take steps to ensure marginalized groups have equal benefit of the law | 1997 | Eldridge v British Columbia (Attorney General) | 0%
|
| Affirmed that section 8 protects an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy from state intrusion | 1984 | Hunter v Southam Inc | 0%
|
| Defined freedom of expression broadly as protecting any non-violent activity that attempts to convey meaning under section 2(b) | 1989 | Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (Attorney General) | 0%
|
| Found that excluding same-sex couples from spousal support provisions violates section 15 equality rights | 1999 | M v H | 0%
|
| Recognized that section 7 protects substantive principles of fundamental justice, not just procedural fairness | 1985 | Reference Re BC Motor Vehicle Act | 0%
|
| Confirmed that extending civil marriage to same-sex couples is consistent with section 15 equality rights | 2004 | Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage | 0%
|
| Established that section 2(a) protects religious freedom and prevents state-imposed religious observance | 1985 | R v Big M Drug Mart | 0%
|
| Confirmed that hate speech falls under freedom of expression, but can be justifiably limited under section 1 | 1990 | R v Keegstra | 0%
|
| Recognized that state restrictions on abortion can violate a woman's security of the person under section 7 | 1988 | R v Morgentaler | 0%
|
| Set out the test for determining when limits on Charter rights are justified under section 1 | 1986 | R v Oakes | 0%
|
| Affirmed that section 7 protects the rights of accused individuals to know the case against them so that they may defend themselves, requiring broad prosecutorial disclosure | 1991 | R v Stinchcombe | 0%
|
| Held that extradition without assurances against the death penalty generally violates section 7 | 2001 | United States v Burns | 0%
|
| Held that exclusion of sexual orientation from human rights protections violates the equality guarantee under section 15 | 1998 | Vriend v Alberta | 0%
|
No matching quizzes found
Score Distribution
Percent of People with Each Score
Percentile by Number Answered
Your Score History
You have not taken this quiz
New and Popular