| Question | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| And how many were done in China, Sweden and the UK? | 1 | 100%
|
| Out of all of the studies used, how many were done in the USA? | 18 | 100%
|
| How many different assessments of children's attachments types were analysed using the strange situation technique (SST)? | 1990 | 100%
|
| How many studies were included in the meta-analysis? | 32 | 100%
|
| Germany had the highest proportion of insecure-avoidant attachment type, with what percentage? | 35% | 100%
|
| 46 | 100%
| |
| Japan had the smallest proportion of insecure-avoidant attachment type, with what percentage? | 5% | 100%
|
| What proportion of the Chinese children assessed had secure attachment? | 50% | 100%
|
| What proportion of the British children assessed had secure attachment? | 75% | 100%
|
| Overall there wasn't much variation in the results between each country, but there was in the different studies within countries. For example, one USA study found [__]% to be securely attached, and another only [__]%. | 90 | 100%
|
| China | 100%
| |
| Germany | 100%
| |
| Which attachment type was the least common in 6/8 countries, such as Britain with only 3%, although Israel had 29%? | Insecure resistant (type C) | 100%
|
| Israel | 100%
| |
| Japan | 100%
| |
| Netherlands | 100%
| |
| Which attachment type was the most common in all 8 countries? | secure (type B) | 100%
|
| Sweden | 100%
| |
| UK | 100%
| |
| What were the 8 countries where these studies took place? | USA | 100%
|