home

Criminal Law: Actus Reus and Mens Rea cases - Statistics

Jump to: Answer Stats | Score Distribution | Your Scores
General Stats
  • This quiz has been taken 14 times
  • The average score is 5 of 15
Answer Stats
Hint Answer % Correct
But for test, gave dying mum poison. R v White [1910]
71%
More than de minimis: Drug dealer. Cato [1976]
57%
Subjective recklessness: Stole gas meter to get money that caused gas leak in another house, killing inhabitant. Cunningham [1957]
57%
Thin skull rule: pre-existing religious beliefs. R v Blaue [1975]
57%
Indirect intention. R v Woollen
57%
Return to subjective recklessness: Kids set fire to newspapers, set bins alight and then a shop. R v G [2004]
43%
Objective recklessness: Drunkenly set fire to hotel, said that drunk danger top others did not cross his mind. Caldwell [1982]
29%
Three pronged test: didn't put out fire that they started Miller [1983]
29%
Blameworthy cause, learner driver was not to blame as V was at fault for accident. Hughes [2013]
14%
Third party: Died to antibiotic which was allergic to. Jordan [1956]
14%
More than de minimus, car chase with friend, D's conduct need not be 'principle or substantial cause of death' Kimsey [1996]
14%
Thin skull rule: pre-exisiting physical conditions. Master (Jitesh) [2007]
14%
Third party: started chain of events. Cheshire [1991]
0%
Intervening acts: fight or flight. Roberts [1972], Marjoram [2000]
0%
Operating cause, train accident, took up rails. R v Benge (1865)
0%
No matching quizzes found
Score Distribution
Percent of People with Each Score
Percentile by Number Answered
Your Score History
You have not taken this quiz
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2026
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Desktop Site | Site Map