| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| Added alcohol to drink without knowing, accessory to drink driving. Need not be 'meeting of minds' for procurement. | AG's Reference (No.1 of 1975) [1975] | 100%
|
| Prize fighting, consent for injury is not defence. | R v Coney (1882) | 100%
|
| Father and son in fight, killed someone, accessory to manslaughter as assistance can be given without knowledge of primary offender. | R v Fury [2006] | 100%
|
| Pestered hitman to kill ex-husband, accessory to murder | R v Luffman [2008] | 100%
|
| E drove D's car dangerously with D in the car. Power of control rule. | Du Cros v Lambourne [1907] | 0%
|
| Allowed truck to carry excessive load. Appealed on basis had no motive to aid. Ruled that motive was irrelevant. | National Coal Board v Gamble [1959] | 0%
|
| Supplied oxygen cutting equipment. One must have knowledge of type of principal offence that would be committed. | R v Bainbridge [1960] | 0%
|
| Accessory to buggery, excited dog... | R v Bourne (1952) | 0%
|
| Hid in caravan to muder, decided not to, but murdered anyway. Accessory only needs foresight of possibility that principal offence will be committed. | R v Bryce [2004] | 0%
|
| Stood and watched as woman raped. Mere presence not enough for aiding. | R v Clarkson [1971] | 0%
|
| Forced wife to have sex with friend, 'if she struggles she likes it', friend did not know. | R v Cogan and Leak [1976] | 0%
|
| Counselled Z to murder, Z decided not to but went berserk and killed anyway. No need for causal link. | R v Culheim [1985] | 0%
|
| Removed the doctrine of joint enterprise liability from English law: an accessory must have intended to assist in the commission of the principal offence, and not merely have foreseen it. | R v Jogee [2016] | 0%
|
| Gave laudanum to third party, put on mantel, another third party gave it to son who died. Innocent agent used. | R v Michael (1840) | 0%
|