| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Purpose, webcam. | Devonald [2008] | 20%
|
| Rape myths | Evans (Chedwyn) (2016) | 20%
|
| S.75: Conditional consent. | Julian Assange v Sweden [2011], F v DPP [2013] | 20%
|
| S.75: Voluntary intoxication. | Bree [2007] | 10%
|
| Lie about fertility. | Lawrence [2020] | 10%
|
| S.75: Violence. | Lewis Mba [2012] | 10%
|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Purpose, no payment. | Linekar [1995] | 10%
|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, consent with HIV positive person. | R v B [2006] | 10%
|
| S.79 'touching' definition. | R v H [2005] | 10%
|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, music teacher. | Williams [1923] | 10%
|
| Mens Rea: Reasonable belief. | DPP v Morgan [1976] | 0%
|
| Intentional inducement, impersonation of boyfriend. | Elbekkay [1995] | 0%
|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, posed as surgeon, faked surgery to have intercourse. | Flattery (1877) | 0%
|
| S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, sent letters as police officer. | Jheta [2007] | 0%
|
| Penetration as continuing act. | Kaitamaki [1984] | 0%
|
| S.75: Unlawful detainment. | Larter and Castleton [1995] | 0%
|
| Gender identity | McNally [2013] | 0%
|
| Intentional inducement, undercover officers in environmental activist group. | R (Monica) [2018] | 0%
|
| Mens rea: Intoxication caused belief in consent. | Woods [1982], Fotteringham [1988] | 0%
|