Featured Quizzes
User Quizzes
Create Quiz
Data and Charts
Word Search
Badges and Games
About JetPunk
Message Board
Random Quiz
Dark Mode
Equity: Creation and Constitution FET Cases - Statistics
General Stats
- This quiz has been taken 1 time
- The average score is 17 of 17
Answer Stats
| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| Gift/trust will be void if choice of a beneficiary will never be known. | Boyce v Boyce (1849) | 100%
|
| Decided that rule in Re London does not apply to shares. | Hunter v Moss [1994] | 100%
|
| Complete list test. | IRC v Broadway Cottages [1955] | 100%
|
| Dangled check above baby, decided there was lack of intention. | Jones v Lock (1865) | 100%
|
| TR1 signed but not given to registry, no common intention to transfer beneficial interest, still beneficially equal. | Khan v Mahmoud [2021] | 100%
|
| Three certainties. | Knight v Knight (1840) | 100%
|
| Symbolic delivery, furniture set with inventory and given chair. | Lock v Heath (1892) | 100%
|
| Father done all formalities to transfer freehold, son treated property like own and sent off to Stamp Office, tried retracting transfer after fallout, held transfer had taken effect at law. | Mascall v Mascall [1984] | 100%
|
| Three methods of title transfer. | Milroy v Lord (1862) | 100%
|
| Bought house, said 'look its all yours', went bankrupt, no constitution of gift. | Re Cole [1964] | 100%
|
| Must identify subject matter distinctly for certainty. | Re London Wine Co [1986] | 100%
|
| Received property from father's will trust, trustee of will trust also trustee of marriage settlement, decided that property vested in marriage settlement due to clause in trust. | RE Ralli's Will Trusts [1964] | 100%
|
| Every effort doctrine. | Re Rose [1952] | 100%
|
| Testatrix left £300 worth of annuities, 'for his sole use', on his death 'what is left to a number of beneficiaries', Found that husband was absolutely entitled to annuities as making a gift was dominant intention. | Sprange v Barnard (1789) | 100%
|
| Fortuitous vesting rule. | Strong v Bird (1874) | 100%
|
| Handwritten signature. | Wood v Smith [1993] | 100%
|
| Intention to transfer shares to lover, not completed transfer form or handed share certificates over, died instate, children claimed and won. | Zeital v Kaye [2010] | 100%
|
No matching quizzes found
Score Distribution
Percent of People with Each Score
Percentile by Number Answered
Your Score History
You have not taken this quiz