| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| Trustees went to court to get declaration. Since Earl had tendency to sue trustees. | Cotton v Earl of Cardigan [2014] | 100%
|
| Lord Diplock provided guidance for granting injunctions. | American Cyanamid [1975] | 0%
|
| Prohibitory final injunction to stop selling land to lower bidder. | Buttle v Saunders [1950] | 0%
|
| Declaration issue as half of trustees were in breach. | Cowan v Scargill [1985] | 0%
|
| Interim injunction to stop publishing wedding photos. (Exception to Cyanamid). | Douglas and others v Hello! Ltd [2001] | 0%
|
| Freezing order named after this case. | Mareva Compania Naiera SA [1980] | 0%
|
| Trustees forced to hand over documents to beneficiaries. (Specific performance) | Re Tillot [1892] | 0%
|
| Substantive cause of action. | The Siskina [1979] | 0%
|
| Courts do not have open discretion with regards to remedies. | Wicks v Wicks [1999] | 0%
|