| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| River regime case studies | Amazon | 100%
|
| Drainage basin case study | Amazonia | 100%
|
| Local reduction | 1/3 | 0%
|
| Before deforestation | 75% water intercepted and evapotranspirated | 0%
|
| Why? | Convectional rainfall | 0%
|
| Amazonia features | Dense canopy | 0%
|
| Indus regime | Dry season casues 5-6 month deficit | 0%
|
| Why? | Evaporation over the Atlantic Ocean blows moist air | 0%
|
| Amazon regime | Gradual rise in discharge | 0%
|
| Amazonia features | High rainfall | 0%
|
| Amazon regime | High rainfall in most months infiltrates quickly | 0%
|
| Indus regime | Himalayan snowmelt in spring | 0%
|
| Indus regime | Igneous and metamorphic rocks increase runoff | 0%
|
| River regime case studies | Indus, south and central asia | 0%
|
| Impact | Infiltration | 0%
|
| Impact | Interception | 0%
|
| Impacts of deforestation | Less future rainfall | 0%
|
| Yukon regime | Rapidly rises in spring due to snowmelt | 0%
|
| Temperate water budget S-D | Recharge | 0%
|
| Impacts of deforestation | Reduced evapotranspiration | 0%
|
| Indus regime | Regular rainfall in monsoon season | 0%
|
| Impacts of deforestation | Saturated overland flow | 0%
|
| Amazon regime | Sedimentary rocks | 0%
|
| Yukon regime | Soils prone to permafrost | 0%
|
| Temperate water budget A-S | Soil water and groundwater depletion | 0%
|
| Temperate water budget J-A | Surplus | 0%
|
| Amazonia features | Warm temperatures | 0%
|
| River regime case studies | Yukon, Alaska, Canada | 0%
|