| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| R56 | Adickes v. Kress Celotex v. Catrett Arnstein v. Porter Dyer v. MacDougall | 0%
|
| R50(b)Renewed JMOL | Ahern v. Scholz | 0%
|
| R14 | Clark v. Associates Commercial Corp. | 0%
|
| R8:Lacking Knowledge or Information | David v. Crompton & Knowles | 0%
|
| R15(a) | David v. Crompton & Knowles | 0%
|
| R35 | Davis v. Ross | 0%
|
| R50(a) JMOL | Galloway v. US Lavender v. Kurn Guenther v. Armstrong Rubber Co. | 0%
|
| R8:Sufficiency of the complaint | Gillispie US v. Board of Harbor Commissioners | 0%
|
| R26(b)2Limitations on Frequency and Extent | In Re Convergent Technologies Securities Litigation | 0%
|
| R12(b)6Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted | IqbalTwombley Mitchell v. A&K | 0%
|
| R19 | Janney v. Shepard Niles | 0%
|
| R20 | Kedra v. City of Philadelphia Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc. | 0%
|
| R15(c)Amendments relating back | Krupski v. Costa Crociere | 0%
|
| R8:Inconsistent Claims or Defenses | McCormick v. Kopman | 0%
|
| R26(b)1Limiting Discovery | McPeek v. Ashcroft Kozlowski v. Sears Davis v. Ross | 0%
|
| R24 | NRDC v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission | 0%
|
| R26(b)3-5Work Product | Upjohn v. US Hickman v. Taylor | 0%
|
| R13 | Wigglesworth v. Teamsters | 0%
|
| R11 | Zuk v. Eastern PA Psych Institute | 0%
|