| Hint | Ideology | Cases | % Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Powell | Balancer | Matthews v. EldridgeKassel v. Consolidated Freightways | 0%
|
| Blackmun | Became liberal | DeShaney v. Winnebago Social ServicesRoe v. Wade | 0%
|
| Goldberg | Broad view of Individual rights | Griswold v. Connecticut | 0%
|
| O'Connor | Center, swing vote | Hamdi v. Rumsfeld | 0%
|
| Roberts | Conservative, but measured | Parents Involved v. Seattle School District | 0%
|
| Frankfurter | Deferential and cautious | Youngstown Sheet and Tube | 0%
|
| Vinson | Deferential except for racial discrimination | Youngstown Sheet and Tube Sweatt Mclaurin | 0%
|
| Court as a whole | Defers to govt. on foreign policy | Dames and Moore v. ReganKorematsu v. US | 0%
|
| White | Does not like heightened scrutiny tests | Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center San Antonio SD v. Rodriguez | 0%
|
| Sutherland | Formalist | Carter v. Carter Coal | 0%
|
| Harlan I | Great dissenter | Plessy v. Ferguson Lochner v. New York Civil Rights Cases | 0%
|
| Brennan | Liberal, lover of individual rights | McClesky v. Kemp | 0%
|
| Black | Liberal textualist | Youngstown Sheet & Tube Griswold v. Connecticut | 0%
|
| Rehnquist | Loves to limit federal power | US v. Lopez Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways | 0%
|
| Kennedy | Middle ground/Realist | Parents Involved v. Seattle School District Lawrence v. Texas | 0%
|
| Burger | Moderate | US v. Nixon | 0%
|
| Stewart | Moderate | Griswold v. Connecticut | 0%
|
| Souter | More liberal than expected | US v. Lopez | 0%
|
| Warren | Not Racist | Brown v. Board Loving v. Virginia | 0%
|
| Thomas | Originialist/Formalist | Parents Involved v. Seattle School District US v. Lopez | 0%
|
| Taney | Racist | Dred Scott v. Sanford | 0%
|
| Cardozo | Realist | Carter v. Carter Coal | 0%
|
| Stevens | Realist | US v. Lopez Parents Involved v. Seattle School District | 0%
|
| Breyer | Realist | US v. Lopez Parents Involved v. Seattle School District | 0%
|
| Harlan II | Robust view of 1A | Yates Griswold v. Connecticut | 0%
|
| Scalia | Staunch conservative, huge textualist | Morrison v. Olson | 0%
|
| Douglas | Strong liberal with commitment to civil liberties | Griswold v. Connecticut | 0%
|
| Holmes | Strong voice on 1A | Shaffer v. US Schneck v. US Abrams v. US | 0%
|