Contract Terms

Quiz by
ewcsgvnrtynn
Rate:
Last updated: May 7, 2025
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedMay 7, 2025
Times taken1
Average score38.5%
Report this quizReport
4:00
Enter answer here
0
 / 39 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Hint
Answer
i. Exam Technique
x
a) Identify all ______
terms
b) Identify what ____ of terms (e.g. express + warranty)
types
c) Identify the ______
breach
d) Identify available _____
remedies
.
x
1. Types of Terms
x
1a. Condition
x
A condition is a vital, fundamental term of the contract.
Poussard v Spiers and Pond
A term is a condition if statute or the parties' explicitly define it as such, OR if it's vital to the contract's purpose and fulfilment
x
Breaching a condition is a ________ breach. The claimant can:
a) Terminate the contract
b) Claim damages for any losses suffered due to the breach
redpuiatory
Just because a term is labelled a "condition" in a contract does not automatically give it the status of a condition in law
Schuler v Wickman
The courts usually regard time as an innominate term. However, they will regard it as a condition if:
1. It is expressly stipulated that "time is of the essence."
or
2. The nature of the contract makes timely performance critical.
or
3. A party serves a notice making time of the essence after a delay.
innominate
.
x
1b. Warranties
x
A warranty is a less important, minor term of the contract.
Bettini v Gye
The claimant can:
a) Claim damages for any loss they suffer.
b) Cannot terminate the contract. If they do, they themselves will be in ____ of the contract.
breach
.
x
1c. Innominate Terms
x
An innominate term is a term in a contract that is neither clearly a condition nor a warranty at the creation of the contract and whose remedy for breaching it depends on the seriousness of the breach and its effect on the contract as a whole.
Hong Kong Shipping v KKK
Hint
Answer
.
x
2. Express Terms
x
Express terms are terms ____ agreed upon by the parties. Express terms can take two forms:
• Oral agreements.
• Written agreements.
explicitly
.
x
1a. Distinguishing a Representation from a Term
x
Representations are statements made during precontract negotiations to _____ someone into entering a contract that do not form part of the contract and so thus do not impose legal obligations. Express terms are statements both parties intend to form part of the contract
induce
The courts take a ____ approach. The question is: Would a reasonable person, in the position of the parties, have understood the statement to be a binding term of the contract — or merely a representation?
holistic
a) Time - A statement made closer to the time of entering into the contract is more likely to be considered an express term. If there is a substantial time gap between the statement and the final contract, the courts are less likely to treat the statement as an express term.
Routledge v Grant
b) Importance - When a statement is of significant importance to one party, and the other party knows this, it is more likely to be considered a term of the contract.
Couchman v Hill
c) Oral Statements Followed by Written Contract - When a contract is in writing, it is presumed that all agreed terms are included in the document. Therefore, pre-contractual oral negotiations are typically not considered terms unless explicitly stated in the written agreement.
Routledge v McKay
d) Special Skills of the Statement Maker - If the person making the statement possesses special knowledge or expertise, and the other party relies on this, the courts are more likely to treat the statement as an express term.
Dick Bentley v Harold Smith
.
x
2. Implied Terms
x
Implied terms are terms not explicitly discussed or agreed upon by the parties during negotiations. These terms are automatically inserted into the contract by law, either by courts or ______.
statute
1. Custom - Courts may imply terms if it is common practice in a particular trade or industry for contracts to include these.
Hutton v Warren
2. Business Efficacy - Courts will imply terms when doing so is necessary to make the contract work properly. The question the courts ask is, "Would the contract still function if this term wasn't implied?" If the answer is no, the court will imply the term to ensure the contract makes sense and achieves its purpose.
The Moorcock
3. Officious Bystander - The officious bystander test states that a term can be implied if an outsider had asked the parties during the contract negotiations whether a particular term should be included and both parties would have immediately said, "Of course!"
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries
4. Reflection of prior dealings - If the parties have engaged in multiple contracts in the past, and those contracts have consistently included certain terms, courts may imply those terms into the current contract.
For example, if a supplier regularly provides goods to a retailer and includes a standard delivery term in each contract, that term may be implied in future contracts, even if not explicitly stated.
Spurling v Bradshaw
Express terms override implied terms by courts.
Les Affreteurs Reunis v Walford
Save Your Stats
Your Next Quiz
Name all 50 states in the USA. Easy, right?
Almost the easiest quiz on JetPunk!
Drag the flag onto the correct state. Careful, though! One wrong move and the game ends.
Drag the pin onto the correct country. Careful, though! Three wrong moves and the game ends.
Comments
No comments yet