Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Precedent
Answer
Landmark case
Hasan
Unavailable for murder
Howe
Unavailable for attempted murder
Gotts
x
x
1. Death/Serious Injury
x
D may only rely on duress to avoid death or serious physical injury. Threat to cause pain is insufficient.
Quayle
The totality of threats may be considered when deciding whether harm feared was serious.
Valderrama-Vaga
Fear of psychological harm is insufficient
Baker & Williams
x
x
2. Direction
x
D's criminal conduct must be in response to fear for safety for:
a) D's immediate family
b) someone close to D
c) A person for whose safety D reasonably regards himself as responsible
Hasan
x
x
3. Response
x
1) Did D honestly and reasonably believe in the efficacy of the threats?
2) Would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing D's characteristics, have acted as D?
Graham
Drug addiction is not a characteristic that can be shared
Flatt
____ is not a characteristic that can be shared
Low IQ
Relevant characteristics include age, sex, pregnancy, physical disability and mental illness
Bowen
The belief needn't be correct
Safi
x
x
4. Causation
x
Coercer must direct D to commit a particular offence. No direction to commit = no defence
Cole
A threat accompanied by a direction to rob any bank is insufficient
Ali
x
x
5. Evasion
x
The defence fails if D reasonably could have avoided committing the crime
Hasan
Where D does not take evasive action due to a personal circumstance, the defence fails
Heath
x
x
6. Self-Inducement
x
D may not rely on duress where he voluntarily associates with others engaged in criminal activity and knew, or ought reasonably have known, there was a risk of being subject to any compulsion by threats of violence.
Hasan
If threats of violence were unforeseeable, the defence is available, even if D engaged in criminal activity