| Hint | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| If it's ____, the defence succeeds. If not, continue. | Involuntary | 100%
|
| There is no MR where D commits a drunken _____ | Mistake | 100%
|
| 1. Was there a mens rea? | x | 100%
|
| . | x | 100%
|
| 2. Was the intoxication voluntary or involuntary? | x | 100%
|
| . | x | 100%
|
| 3. Was the crime specific or basic intent? | x | 100%
|
| . | x | 100%
|
| 4. Would D have foreseen the risk if sober? | x | 100%
|
| D's knowledge of the strength or nature of the intoxicant is immaterial to whether the intoxication was voluntary or involuntary | Allen | 0%
|
| if D forms the intent to commit a crime while sober, and then drinks alcohol to summon the courage to carry it out, the defence fails. | Gallagher | 0%
|
| If D has the mens rea of the crime, the defence fails. | Kingston | 0%
|
| If the crime was specific intent, the defence succeeds. If not, continue. | Majewski | 0%
|
| If no, the defence succeeds. | Richardson v Irwin | 0%
|