Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Hint
Answer
1. A Theft
X
If there is no completed theft, there cannot be a robbery
Robinson
x
2. Force, or Threat of Force, During or Immediately Before the Theft, to Facilitate It
x
Force can be minimal as long as it's used to facilitate the theft, and is not defined in statute. It is up to juries to decide on a case by case basis.
Dawson & James
Snatching something amounts to force
Clouden
The threat of force does not have to be genuine or realisable. It's sufficient that D intends to cause the victim to fear being subjected to immediate force, and for the purposes of facilitating the theft.
Bentham
Neither does the threat of force have to be effective. It's sufficient that D intends to cause the victim to fear being subjected to immediate force, and for the purposes of facilitating the theft.
R v DPP
Where D uses force after the taking has occurred, the courts will take a flexible view and view the theft as a continuing act, ensuring D does not escape liability off a technicality.
Hale/Lockley
The threat of force must be ______
Immediate
.
x
3. Intent to use/threaten force to facilitate the theft.
x
Where D uses force or puts someone in fear of being subjected to force for some reason OTHER than to steal, he will not be guilty of robbery.
It's election day and you are representing the Lime Green Party of America. Name any state to grab its electoral votes and defeat the hated Periwinkle party.