| Question | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| During arbitration, a respondent refuses to submit evidence. What is the correct approach of the tribunal? | Continue proceedings, considering the evidence presented by the claimant. | 100%
|
| In an arbitration case under ICC rules, both parties agree to consolidation. What key factor makes consolidation possible? | It requires all parties’ consent. | 100%
|
| A claimant in an arbitration case seeks punitive damages. Which factor is most likely to affect the tribunal’s decision? | The arbitration seat’s laws on punitive damages. | 100%
|
| A U.S. company wins an arbitration award in Geneva against a French company. What is the most crucial factor for the award’s enforceability under the New York Convention? | The award must meet procedural standards at the arbitral seat. | 100%
|
| A German company challenges an arbitral award in Germany due to a procedural defect. What is the most likely jurisdiction for handling this challenge? | The court where the arbitration was conducted (arbitral seat). | 100%
|
| The arbitration tribunal in a dispute between an oil company and a government issues a “partial award.” What does this typically mean? | The tribunal ruled only on the issue of liability, not damages. | 100%
|
| A company based in Sweden initiates arbitration against its partner in Brazil under UNCITRAL rules. When does the arbitration officially start? | When the claimant files a notice of arbitration. | 100%
|
| A French company challenges the enforcement of an arbitral award in a U.S. court, claiming the award was annulled in France. What key principle will the U.S. court likely consider? | Whether the French annulment aligns with the New York Convention. | 100%
|
| In the Karaha Bodas case, Pertamina argued that enforcement of the arbitral award violated public policy. How did the U.S. court respond? | The court narrowly interpreted the public policy exception and enforced the award. | 50%
|
| Atribunal issued an award under UNCITRAL rules. The award has been set aside in the country of the arbitral seat. What is the likelihood of it being enforced elsewhere? | Some countries may still enforce it based on their local laws | 0%
|