| Assume position | Cash-flow city | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| 2. (US) | New York | 100%
|
| 1. (US) | San Francisco | 95%
|
| 8. (Europe) | London | 85%
|
| 6. (US) | Los Angeles | 85%
|
| 19. (Europe) | Paris | 85%
|
| 10. (SE Asia) | Singapore | 85%
|
| 3. (E Asia) | Beijing | 80%
|
| 21. (US) | Chicago | 80%
|
| 11. (E Asia) | Tokyo | 80%
|
| 18. (US) | Seattle | 75%
|
| 9. (E Asia) | Shanghai | 75%
|
| 20. (US) | Miami | 70%
|
| 5. (US) | Boston | 65%
|
| 12. (E Asia) | Hong Kong | 65%
|
| 17. (US) | San Diego | 60%
|
| 30. (Oceania) | Sydney | 60%
|
| 22. (US) | Washington | 60%
|
| 28. (US) | Atlanta | 55%
|
| 15. (Europe) | Berlin | 55%
|
| 26. (S Asia) | Delhi | 55%
|
| 25. (US) | Philadelphia | 50%
|
| 4. (US) | San Jose | 50%
|
| 24. (US) | Austin | 45%
|
| 29. (S.Am) | São Paulo | 45%
|
| 14. (E Asia) | Seoul | 45%
|
| 13. (W Asia) | Tel Aviv | 45%
|
| 7. (SE Asia) | Jakarta | 40%
|
| 16. (E Asia) | Shenzhen | 40%
|
| 23. (Europe) | Stockholm | 35%
|
| 27. (S Asia) | Bangalore | 30%
|