| Question | Answer | % Correct |
|---|---|---|
| What does mens rea mean | Guilty mind | 80%
|
| What was the main purpose of creating the Supreme Court | Separate judiciary from legislature | 80%
|
| Which reform created the UK Supreme Court | Constitutional Reform Act 2005 | 70%
|
| What does Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 require | Courts interpret legislation compatibly | 70%
|
| What is parliamentary soverignty | Parliament can make or unmake any law | 70%
|
| Which statement best reflects the Caparo v Dickman test | Duty depends on foreseeability, proximity, fairness | 60%
|
| Which is NOT a valid ground of judicial review | Merits of decision | 60%
|
| What is a key requirement in Alcock for secondary victims | Close tie of love and affection | 50%
|
| Which Act incorporated the ECHR into UK law | Human Rights Act 1998 | 50%
|
| What are the three certainties in trusts | Intention, subject matter, objects | 50%
|
| What is judicial review | Review of executive legality | 50%
|
| Which case confirmed limits on recovery for pure economic loss | Spartan Steel v Martin | 40%
|
| How many justices normally sit in the Supreme Court | 9 | 30%
|
| What does stare decisis mean | Binding precedent | 30%
|
| What are the three elements of the Caparo test | Foreseeability, proximity, fairness | 30%
|
| Which principle is most closely associated with Donoghue v Stevenson | Neighbour principle | 30%
|
| Which case established the neighbour principle | Rylands v Fletcher | 30%
|
| In R v G (2003), which test was rejected | Caldwell objective recklessness | 20%
|
| What is the primary constitutional role of the UK Supreme Court | Create legislation | 20%
|
| Which defence replaced provocation | Loss of control | 20%
|
| What must valid consideration be | Equal | 10%
|
| Which case established consideration must move from the promisee | Tweddle v Atkinson | 10%
|
| When was the UK Supreme Court established | 2009 | 0%
|
| Which case limited promissory estoppel as a defence only | Combe v Combe | 0%
|
| Which principle was central in overturning prior executive immunity in judicial review | Rule in Entick v Carrington | 0%
|