On this map you see discontinuous corridors of urbanisation characterised by similar industries. Try to name all cities with a population of at least 250k located with in them.
After six years of existance and so many of you nominating this quiz, showing me how much you enjoy playing it, I have decided to sit down again and revamp the map. I think it turned out quite a bit nicer than what I was able to produce back then. Thank you for your appreciation!
Nominated. However, I think a couple of minutes could be sliced off. For example, I had over 8 min for the last ten and nearly 7 min for the last five. Cannot be the only one with such buffer.
Excellent quiz - the best geography quiz I have seen on this website in months. I was surprised to see Wuppertal. I guess the legacy of a suspension monorail?!
I think city proper is actually quite sensible here, seeing as urban areas are nebulous models and economic areas are already nebulous models. I like to have a bit of reality left in a quiz that already includes so much abstraction. Also there’s a very practical reason for not using urban areas here. Above 1 million there is good universal urban area data for Europe on citypopulation.de, but when you want to include smaller cities, which is necessary here, then citypopulation.de starts becoming quite weird, one example being Vila Nova de Gaia which is not combined with Porto even though it’s only separated by a river, and Porto having the same urban as proper population, which all doesn’t make a lot of sense. Other countries have better urban area population data on citypopulation.de, but I’m not going to use different data for different countries. For obvious reasons city proper population does not need a universal model implemented in all nations the same way.
Well at the end of the day that's Brussels and Porto, small cities with many other small cities in their vicinity. Also note, if I were to use the flawed urban area data of citypopulation.de (for cities smaller than 1 million), that would mean including not 13 cities in the UK, but 21, while Porto would still be omitted, but its suburb Vila Nova de Gaia would be included. In my opinion that is not an improvement: you would have to name Gillingham and Farnborough, while still knowing Porto for naught.
I dont know about this tbh. The blue and the golden banana kinda make sense but the other regions just feel like a random selection of orbitrary cities. What is the Atlantic axis supposed to be? You could just as well draw a circle around Lisbon, Sevilla and Cadiz. Or Dublin, Cork, Glasgow. Or Nantes, Bordeaux, Bilbao...
I partly agree, and I invite you to create other regions, maybe even make a quiz of it. I’d be interested to play it. If your reasoning for your regions is better than the models included here, and you write a scientific paper about it, they might even become the preferred models in the scientific community.
Note however, that these regions are being used as models by local, national and transnational authorities and organisations. See Atlantic Axis, Gulf of Finland and String
Yes, I didnt mean to criticize your choices of regions you included, it makes sense to include the ones accepted and published. I just felt the researchers defining them as regions in the first place made very vague and orbitrary choices :D
Gothenburg is way too far south on this map (should be in line with the northern tip of Jutland and the southern tip of the Vättern) and Rotterdam should be southeast of Den Haag, a fair bit inland.
I also get that you wouldn't want to make quiz takers list every major city in the Ruhr area, but then it seems weirdly inconsistent to ask for L'Hospitalet de Llobregat and Espoo.
I would always count Düsseldorf and Wuppertal as part of the Ruhr area. That might be wrong, but I just gave up after trying a few cities (Essen, Duisburg, Bochum) because I didn't want to guess which cities were included and not. I get that Cologne and Bonn are outside but I definitely think this quiz would benefit if it demanded naming the 8-10 largest Ruhr cities.
Bleep me that is a tough quiz. Even given the level of obscure knowledge people on this site have, I am amazed the average score is that high, especially as the time is quite tight.
I've never understood why Paris or even the industralized north of France around Lille weren't part of the Blue Banana. My best guess is that Paris is too far from other industrialized areas and Lille is decaying rather than developing
However, city proper is not very useful, especially in a quiz like this, so I do think urban area population should be used.
Nice quiz though :)
I also get that you wouldn't want to make quiz takers list every major city in the Ruhr area, but then it seems weirdly inconsistent to ask for L'Hospitalet de Llobregat and Espoo.