Ebert's Most Hated

Hint

Answer

"There is an idiocy here that seems almost intentional, as if the filmmakers plotted to leave anything of interest or entertainment value out of these episodes."

"The only way to save this film would be to trim 86 minutes."

"Here it is at last, the first 150-minute trailer."

"Have they so lost touch with human nature that they think audiences will like this [...]?"

"What James Mason [...] is doing in this film is beyond me; he told one interviewer he needed the money for his alimony payments, but surely jail would've been better."

"The film countains no evidence of Scientology or any other system of thought; it is shapeless and senseless, without a compelling plot or characters we care for in the slightest."

"[Title] aspires to the soft-core porn achievements of the earlier film, but succeeds instead of creating a new genre, no-core porn."

"There are no doubt people who believe that if this movie is as bad as I say it is, it must be worth seeing. People who simply cannot believe any film could be this vile."

"This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. The movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. The movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."

"Going to see [title] at the Palais of the Cannes Film Festival is like attending a satanic ritual in St. Peter's Basilica."