Name the second-largest cities of each country in Europe (by metropolitan area population).
Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/cities/continent/europe with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_metropolitan_areas_in_Europe and additional data searches for countries with only one city listed in some of these lists.
Defining a metropolitan area is difficult, and different sources define them differently! I've re-updated this quiz using a consistent source now, which changed several answers. It's probably the best it can be!
Evil aliens have decided to kill everyone on Earth! Fortunately, they've given you two minutes to save as many as you can. All you have to do is name a country to save everyone in it.
Thank you, this must have been a typo on my part, I can't see that it was ever called Homel. Or a typo on the old Wikipedia page - it appears that the data this quiz was based on no longer exists on Wikipedia.
This comes from a misunderstanding of Slavic languages and the best ways to transliterate Cyrillic into Latin.
The name of the city is written as "Гомел" - which, if you transliterate from (Russian) Cyrillic into Latin, gives you "Gomel."
However Belorussian is not Russian. In Belorussian (as well as Ukrainian and a few other Slavic languages), the letter "Г" is pronounced as an "H" not as a "G." Meaning that the name of the city is (locally) pronounced as "Homel."
Since the only authoritative spelling is the Cyrillic one, it becomes ambiguous as to how to spell it in Latin.
Personally I would recommend having "Gomel" as the answer but accepting both "Homel" and "Homiel" as type-ins.
I know that I always try both "Gomel" and "Homel" for this city in quizzes just in case one is accepted but the other isn't.
Honestly the data's kind of all over the place. Because some of these seem to be city proper populations, some of them seem to be urban area. And then there are also a few examples (the one that sticks out to me is Kópavogur in Iceland) where the accepted answer is actually inside the same metro area as the largest city.
(Which isn't to even begin addressing the case of Monaco - where both Monte Carlo and La Condamine are merely neighbourhoods inside the singular city of Monaco which is co-extensive with the country as a whole, and one could make an argument that this answer should appear as "N/A" the same way that Vatican City's does.)
But eh. It is what it is. I understand that the data was just taken from a Wikipedia page (yuck) and it's maybe best to not editorialize/mess with it.
It's a really complicated question. Defining populations of metro areas is not as straightforward as we might like. What is a metro area, what is a city....so I come from Dallas, and for sure Ft. Worth and its suburbs are considered part of the same metropolitan area, but I can assure you that plenty of people from Ft. Worth are none too happy to be lumped in with Dallas. Culturally they consider themselves very distinct, and there's a lot of truth to it.
As the world urbanizes more, and some urban areas stretch so far that they practically meld into others, it gets increasingly complicated. How long until Washington D.C. and Baltimore are a single metropolitan area? How much longer after that before you never leave urbanization taking I-95 up to Philadelphia? I'm sure there's also a lot of debate at the fringes of metro areas as to what communities are included.
City proper population is much easier, but also much less intuitive.
Given there's several where you can't just quickly write the "obvious" answer (due to the city / metro area type uncertainty discussed in other comments), it is tight on time even if you know your large cities.
Why do you tell people that you count popuiation of metro areas if the answers are for city proper population? If you counted metro ares then for Poland second biggest city is Katowice, for city proper it is Kraków
Well, because the data source I used indicated that it was metro area, but perhaps it wasn't. As I have searched through databases, it looks like every site defines a metro area slightly differently. Even Katowice here in this instance is really complicated, because its metropolitan area is often defined as including Ostrava in the Czech Republic, and it doesn't seem logical at all to talk about second cities of Europe and have metropolitan areas that extend across multiple countries.
Do you have any better data sources that I haven't found? Would love suggestions.
I see that now that I am looking up both individually on Wiki. The data source I used indicated that they were metro area populations, but maybe it's a mixture, or maybe it's only city proper. Do you happen to have a better data source, I have not been able to find a good one!
The data source I used indicated that they were metro area populations, but maybe it's a mixture, or maybe it's only city proper. Do you happen to have a better data source, I have not been able to find a good one!
I actually double checked, and Wikipedia indicates that Manchester is the right answer, with "Greater Manchester" having a metro population of 2.9 million while the "West Midlands Conurbation" (for Birmingham) is 2.4m.
The name of the city is written as "Гомел" - which, if you transliterate from (Russian) Cyrillic into Latin, gives you "Gomel."
However Belorussian is not Russian. In Belorussian (as well as Ukrainian and a few other Slavic languages), the letter "Г" is pronounced as an "H" not as a "G." Meaning that the name of the city is (locally) pronounced as "Homel."
Since the only authoritative spelling is the Cyrillic one, it becomes ambiguous as to how to spell it in Latin.
Personally I would recommend having "Gomel" as the answer but accepting both "Homel" and "Homiel" as type-ins.
I know that I always try both "Gomel" and "Homel" for this city in quizzes just in case one is accepted but the other isn't.
(Which isn't to even begin addressing the case of Monaco - where both Monte Carlo and La Condamine are merely neighbourhoods inside the singular city of Monaco which is co-extensive with the country as a whole, and one could make an argument that this answer should appear as "N/A" the same way that Vatican City's does.)
But eh. It is what it is. I understand that the data was just taken from a Wikipedia page (yuck) and it's maybe best to not editorialize/mess with it.
As the world urbanizes more, and some urban areas stretch so far that they practically meld into others, it gets increasingly complicated. How long until Washington D.C. and Baltimore are a single metropolitan area? How much longer after that before you never leave urbanization taking I-95 up to Philadelphia? I'm sure there's also a lot of debate at the fringes of metro areas as to what communities are included.
City proper population is much easier, but also much less intuitive.
If anyone has any specific changes, I'm all ears.
Esch is the main part of the name, and "sur Alzette" (on Alzette) is a qualifier.
Do you have any better data sources that I haven't found? Would love suggestions.
However, this has only a population of ~200k (metro area ~650k), while Antwerp has a population of ~565k (metro area ~1.2m)