Sportswashing

+6

Sportswashing and its Issues

Sport. We all love it. Well, even if you hate it, there is no denying its gargantuan value that it brings to both people and economies. In 2022, the global sports industry racked $403 billion in 2022 and is expected to rise to $680 Billion in 2028. However, a grotesque plague is spreading like no other in modern sport. Sportswashing. It is quite astonishing that such a prevalent topic is not common knowledge, and I am sure many reading this are sports fans. It is a term used to describe the practice of nations, individuals, groups, corporations, or the government using sports to improve reputations tarnished by wrongdoing. The term was fist coined at the 2015 European Games in Baku, Azerbaijan. Amnesty International voice that although it is a safe country, defending human rights and free speech is a difficult game there. The Guardian and certain other news outlets were barred from covering the games. The West were also quick to criticize Aliyev’s (PM) intention to close OCSE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (aims for free and fair elections, human rights, and freedom of the press)) Offices in Baku. The term may have been first coined in 2015, but it does not mean that this has not occurred before. A prime example is the 1936 Berlin Olympics in Nazi Germany, no prizes for what that is trying to cover(!) This is something that we must speak out upon. Ever since an early age, I have been a sport fan and I know a multitude of you are as well, but must we comprise ethics to get to what we want, when we want?

It hits closer to home when you learn its your people who suffer which is evident in through the Qatar World Cup in 2022. This stadium is in the thumbnail is a work of art, isn’t it? But how would you feel to know blood built these walls? Disgusted, right? Thousands of migrants have flocked to nations like Qatar (mostly South Asians) in order to earn a living; to send back money to their innocent families only to be brutally exploited under the Kafala System and the sweltering 50-degree weather. It is so scorching that the June-July fixtures were moved to November and December. According to The Guardian, 6,000 migrants have died from stadium building in Qatar. I am not here to slander Qatar who have seemed to listen to the voice of the community, abolishing the system and establishing a minimum wage, however they are a yet to grant heavy compensation to the victim’s families and have only seemed to act due to international pressure.

Another reason Qatar was under heavy controversy was due to their treatment of certain groups (which was a concern for welfare of paying tourists) and the way they supposedly ‘bought’ their way into this World Cup mirrored by Russia who also had their 2018 bid confirmed at the same committee. There is heavy evidence to support that millions of dollars in bribes were offered (denied by both) but the fact that eleven out of the twenty-two committee members were banned or arrested is really telling. The big reveal of the hosts occurred in December 2010 and the arrests occur during the 2015 FIFA Corruption Scandal. The President of FIFA at the time (Sepp Blatter) resigned as was subsequently banned until 2027.

The term of ‘sportswashing’ has appeared repeatedly in recent news due to the possible monopolising of sports by Saudi Arabia seen in tennis, football, golf and boxing. Recently they have had their 2034 World Cup bid accepted (on fair terms) but the same pressing issues seen in Qatar could be mirrored there. According to human rights group Grant Liberty, Saudi Arabia has spent $1.5 billion on ‘sportswashing activities’ between 2014 and 2021. And additionally, have spent at least $6.3bn (£4.9bn) in sports deals since early 2021.

There is absolutely no issue with an Arab Nation or smaller nations running a major sporting event, I heavily encourage this to happen after all these major sporting events have ‘World’ in them such as the World Cup, which is a symbol of unity over a simple game that we can all enjoy! For example, 1.5 billion people united and watched the World Cup Final. That is 18.75% of the world population! It is understandable that the Arab World wants to show that it can represent it, for example this World Cup has brought Qatar into higher relevance and a chance where they can gain revenue, diversifying away from oil. However, it should have been done under ethical practices.

This idea of sportswashing is not only used to cover up tarnished representations but also as a political tool. This can be seen in India’s hosting of the 2023 Cricket World Cup. The Prime Minister of India has used it to his advantage, put on a spectacle especially with a newly refurbished 132,000 capacity stadium which he aptly named after himself. Despite India not winning the competition, the tournament created national pride which therefore increased his popularity and therefore was a substantial influence in his 2024 election victory especially as his support is dwindling. It also hid the fact that they failed to send a team to Pakistan for the 2023 Asia Cup.

A famous moment in sports was the ‘The Rumble in the Jungle’, a heavyweight clash between George Foreman and Muhammad Ali in 1974 which occurred in Kinshasa, Zaire (now the DRC) run by a dictator. Other examples of sportswashing throughout history is the 1978 FIBA World Championship in the Philippines, the 2015 AIBA World Boxing Championship in Qatar, the 2016 UCI Road World Championships (also Qatar), the 2003 Cricket World Cup in Zimbabwe and the hosting of the 2025 Italian and Spanish Super Cups in Saudi Arabia and the 2021 Trophée des Champions held in Israel.

Solutions:

-          Creation of a UN body that oversees the governmental aspect of sports, collaborating with such corporations like FIFA and the IOC.

-          Offer higher penalties for corrupt sports decisions and bribery.

-          Create larger awareness of this happening in the world so it can be disputed and so justice can prevail.

10 Comments
+4
Level 63
Jan 26, 2025
I don't think the world cup (which was lost :( ) helped Modi win

Good blog, helped me learn something!

+3
Level 65
Jan 26, 2025
modi was already seen in a positive light prior to hosting the ODI CWC, due to the popularity of nationalism rising india. the world cup didn’t do much to put him in a good light within india. every leader has their haters.
+2
Level 70
Jan 27, 2025
Indian politicians naming stadiums and other important projects after themselves certainly isn't new (sadly). The Cricket World Cup was designed for India to win, and with Modi set to be the one handing the trophy to the victors, it was definitely a ploy to insert himself in the nationalism felt by the populous (of course, that wasn't to be for India), and I think had the result gone another way, he would've won the election by more for sure.
+1
Level 40
Jan 30, 2025
I (an Indian) don't think Modi's slide in popularity was significantly affected by India's loss in the World Cup.

A more important factor was the anti-incumbency for the ruling party, as the BJP (the ruling party during the elections, led by Modi) had been in power for a decade by then), as well as other factors.

And, heads of state or other important figures handing trophies to the winners is no new phenomenon.

+2
Level 59
Jan 27, 2025
Interesting blog - it's also important to mention that the conditions in which Saudi Arabia got their world cup bid was because FIFA combined two separate bids for the 2030 world cup, meaning that it couldn't be held in Europe, Africa or South America.
+2
Level 52
Jan 29, 2025
ah yes
+2
Level 52
Jan 29, 2025
I also forgot to mention that it is not just countries that do this but also companies. Two major companies are INEOS and Arabtec. INEOS is a major polluter and has caused many gas leaks and seem to cover this up through ventures in cycling and football (even F1). Arabtec follows inhumane conditions for their workers. In 2019, they sponsored Manchester City.
+2
Level 40
Jan 30, 2025
You mention the Narendra Modi Stadium. But I want to point out a few things that I think are some errors. {Of course, I may be biased or inaccurate myself.}:

1. Support had indeed been on a slide for the BJP, but saying that the construction (not refurbishment, as the previous stadium was demolished) of this stadium was a 'substantial' influence would be incorrect. The stadium finished construction in early 2020, and the World Cup ended in December 2023, way before the general elections to significantly impact the election results.

2. The decision to not send a team to Pakistan is a nuanced issue and part of the larger conflict between India and Pakistan, over the region of Kashmir. Simply mentioning it, almost as a throwaway, or add-on, does not reflect the myriad problems, and dilemmas of the failure to send a team to Pakistan.

Otherwise, your article is remarkably essential and eye-opening. I was somewhat aware of the adoption of sports as a curtain, but your post is very good

+2
Level 52
Jan 31, 2025
Yeah, it may seem a little far fetched for that to influence Modi's victory. He was stilll highly popular anyways. I take the issues that are prevelant on board and so much future blogs can be more accurate! Thank you so much for the feedback and the praise at the end!
+2
Level 40
Feb 1, 2025
You're welcome.

And as I said, this was an excellent intro to a not-well-known topic. I ran out of characters at the end, but your post shines a light on the systematic cover-up of incorrect actions.

I believe 'sportswashing' is a portmanteau of sports and whitewashing?