It is kind of worrying that only 17% got the British Prime Minister. Being British I don't claim to know masses about US politics but I can safely say I at least know the American head of state (and a few other notable figures too)!!
We tried to watch part of the World Cup in school, but we gave up because we thought the projector's speakers were busted. Turns out it was several thousand people using vuvuzelas.
Actually, he's right. I used to work for a company that distributed BP products. They threw a bit of a hissy fit if they were ever referred to as 'British Petroleum'. They threw off the name to become more international (and probably to distance themselves from one or two things they had done under the former name).
LOL, yeah ~ when I glanced at the question, my heart sank, because I thought we were going to type that word salad! It would have been a fun practical joke to play on us, though.
The study would not take into account any of the deaths caused by malaria, or other secondary causes of death, only the direct deaths from building collapse etc... There is also no way that they could come up with an accurate statistic. Perhaps it is just better not to put a death count and just write it as a major earthquake, since no one would guess it from the deathcount alone?
Point out even one thing on here that is even remotely similar to a war crime. They range from the pathetically insignificant to the completely obvious with a few interesting things sprinkled in that there was no valid reason to compromise security and intelligence gathering in order to reveal to the public. There was not a single war crime. The "collateral murder" video doesn't even count for that. Honest mistakes are not war crimes.
According to an editorial in The Washington Post, the leak "mainly demonstrates that the truth about Iraq "already has been told"
..exactly. People die in a war. Not exactly revelatory.
Abu Graib broke in 2004.
Not investigating claims made against Iraqi police is not an American war crime.
Revealing marginally higher figures for casualties than were previously admitted years prior is not evidence of a war crime.
Misidentifying casualties in reports, even intentionally, is not a war crime.
Many of the things here reveal corruption or malfeasance by Iraqis or other coalition countries. In many instances Americans intervened to stop such abuses. In others they did not. Obviously those are not American war crimes.
Killing targets on the ground who at first try to surrender to and later run from a helicopter is not a war crime.
Many contractors and some soldiers were indicted for various crimes. But not for anything revealed by Wikileaks.
It means something like mountains of the islands icicle/glacier... Or glacier of the islands mountains.
(And yea I know for english possesive you need to place apostrophes somewhere.... But I never know how to use them... and since this is jetpunk, interpunction doesnt matter hahah)
For the GM's electric car please accept Ampera - Opel Ampera is the same car as the Chevrolet Volt. Just as Chevy is almost non-existent make in Europe GM sells it here as Opel.
We're sorry and we're trying to be less important so that the rest of the world gets more attention. We even elected a reality TV star to be president. If we still dominate international politics, economics, technology, and popular culture you can't say it's for a lack of not trying, and not really our fault if the rest of the world continues to be less relevant. Plus half of these questions have little to nothing to do with America.
Top 10 Revelations from Wikileaks
Point out even one thing on here that is even remotely similar to a war crime. They range from the pathetically insignificant to the completely obvious with a few interesting things sprinkled in that there was no valid reason to compromise security and intelligence gathering in order to reveal to the public. There was not a single war crime. The "collateral murder" video doesn't even count for that. Honest mistakes are not war crimes.
According to an editorial in The Washington Post, the leak "mainly demonstrates that the truth about Iraq "already has been told"
..exactly. People die in a war. Not exactly revelatory.
Abu Graib broke in 2004.
Not investigating claims made against Iraqi police is not an American war crime.
Revealing marginally higher figures for casualties than were previously admitted years prior is not evidence of a war crime.
Misidentifying casualties in reports, even intentionally, is not a war crime.
Many of the things here reveal corruption or malfeasance by Iraqis or other coalition countries. In many instances Americans intervened to stop such abuses. In others they did not. Obviously those are not American war crimes.
Killing targets on the ground who at first try to surrender to and later run from a helicopter is not a war crime.
Many contractors and some soldiers were indicted for various crimes. But not for anything revealed by Wikileaks.
... Eyjafjallajökull ...
(And yea I know for english possesive you need to place apostrophes somewhere.... But I never know how to use them... and since this is jetpunk, interpunction doesnt matter hahah)
'Chevy Volt' is just the American name.
Sees Tik Tok-Gets Confused