The modern player is more athletic in every way, coaching methods have improved enormously and commitment to the sport have resulted in phenomenal offensive accomplishments.
Those who did experiment with PEDs will someday be recognized as pioneering heroes.
To quote someone who actually USED steroids, Jose Canseco, "Steroids make a good player great, and a great player super-human." The numbers bear this out 100%. Why do you think players risk multi-million dollar careers to take the juice? Because it helps their complexion?
Your cynicism gets annoying. Canseco "wrote" his book because he was mad at baseball. Some of those he accused were never confirmed. That doesn't mean some weren't users. Ivan Rodriguez, for example, lost a lot of weight during the off season after "Juiced...." came out.
However, there's no evidence against Anderson or Luis Gonzalez, for example.
And how about the hundreds (or more?) who werent helped? You still had to be good.
You still had to be good, but Brady Anderson was a career leadoff hitter who somehow packed an extra 35 home runs into one season. The years preceding his 50-home run season, he hit 13, 12, and 16 home runs, respectively. In the two years subsequent, he hit 18 home runs each year, and played over 100 games in each of those seasons. It's really hard to believe he wasn't taking steroids. How else can you explain such an unprecedented power explosion out of nowhere? And if he wasn't cheating, why didn't he keep up whatever he did during 1996? I just can't fathom any other reasonable explanation in his case. Gonzalez shows basically the same arc, but his annual home run totals were slightly higher. We're not in a court of law where you need proof beyond all reasonable doubt. Reasonable people can assess the information before them and draw reasonable conclusions. Those guys were on steroids.
The opposite argument could be made: if Anderson WAS cheating why didn't he keep up his 1996 production? With such success why would he have stopped juicing after one season?
Because there are side effects that don't show up on the stat sheet. There are risks that come with juicing. Maybe Brady Anderson just decided those risks weren't worth doing it for another season. Or maybe his conscience kicked in. His drop off back to the mean is easily explained.
Not a single person identified by Canseco ever turned out to be clean. Not one. Maybe I missed it, but has anyone fingered by Canseco ever sued him? All evidence that has surfaced since he blew the lid off the steroids epidemic in baseball has done nothing but verify what he said.
Pretty incredible that Sammy Sosa broke Roger Maris's mark three different times and didn't even lead the league in any of those years. I get annoyed watching the enhanced balls fly out of the park so often in 2019. The steroid era looks preposterous in retrospect.
The current era is even worse, in my opinion. There are even more home runs than during the steroid era. This year, 58 different players hit at least 30 home runs. With players focusing on "launch angle", the tiny modern ballparks, and the juiced ball, there are so many routine pop flies that drift over the fence. And I have a feeling that players are still using steroids (Nelson Cruz's home run numbers seem strangely immune to father time, for example).
There's a Twitter account called "Juice Ball Exposed" that posts the most ridiculous home run from each night, along with a bunch of posts and stats dripping with righteous indignation. My friends and I have some good laughs sharing the videos, although the feed itself raises some strong point. If only accounts addressing important political issues were so organized and entertaining.
There are other reasons why home runs have been up again recently. I'll point to this recent bit from an article in the Toronto Star: "And sparked by batters going for the fences to beat suffocating shifts, strikeouts set a record for the 12th year in a row and outnumbered hits for the second straight season." So, new defensive alignments have meshed with a massive move away from "small ball": bunts, steals, choking up with two strikes. It's now feast-or-famine batters one through nine, all the time. I think the game suffers for it.
I read it to suggest that buck was not alive back when Maris broke 60, so the only people *he* had seen hit 60 before Judge did it (Bonds, Sosa, and McGwire) had not done it cleanly.
From 1995 thru 2002 (8 years), someone hit the 50-home run mark 18 times, including at least 1 player every year.
From 1903 thru 1997 (95 years), someone managed 60 HRs twice (Ruth & Maris)
From 1998 thru 2001 (4 years), someone hit 63 or more HRs 3 times without even leading the league.
Are there still morons out there who think steroids don't help players hit more home runs?
Oh yeah, and guess which year Brady Anderson experimented with steroids?
Those who did experiment with PEDs will someday be recognized as pioneering heroes.
However, there's no evidence against Anderson or Luis Gonzalez, for example.
And how about the hundreds (or more?) who werent helped? You still had to be good.