I think that the countries that have a problem with these two scales are the ones that speak Portuguese, Brazil and Portugal for starters use different scales...
Quizmaster, this is highly controversial. Never heard of the term "long scale" before but as SenileS says, it makes much more sense. I don't agree that billion for Million squared is no longer current in UK. I'm British and I use it - so that proves you wrong, n'est-ce pas? Some years ago the BBC decided that they would switch to the American system (traitors!) but since when have they authority to alter the meanings of words in my language? Please accept billion as a valid answer to the question.
I hate almost every change Americans have made to our language. But thousand million is just silly. And no one in any kind of mathematical circle would use it.
I wouldn't call it "Italian champagne". Though it's very much like Champagne, Champagne can only be named so if it's from specific French regions while Prosecco can only be named so if it's from specific Italian regions.
My geology lecturer would have lost his mind if I'd suggested your Rock / Boulder analogy. The scientific terms are cobble / boulder (both of which are differently sized rocks). We were taught to avoid non-scientific lay terms such as pebble, stone, etc. under threat of failure if we ever used them! Takes me back to my days at uni...
This is way harder than the first nine. I've never even seen the word diminuendo before. Or Prosecco. Had no idea that a ranch is called a "station" in Australia. I still got 17, but almost all of them were harder than any of the previous nine quizzes, all of which I've taken within the last 24 hours.
It might be worth accepting galactose for the sugar one, since it's a monosaccharide (like fructose but unlike lactose). Of course, anyone who knows what galactose is will go for lactose when that doesn't work, so it's unlikely to matter.
Tougher than the others for sure, but fun. However, the Gandalf/Magneto/HanSolo one makes no sense to me. It was clear that of the first two, it was the same actor playing both, but there's no real relationship between those characters other than the actor. If that's all it is, then technically the answer could be any other role that was played by Harrison Ford, which really isn't an analogy in my view. I did eventually get it after guessing a few, but this one isn't up to the same standard as the other questions.
This was one of mine that was borrowed from my Movie Analogies quiz, which admittedly I haven't updated in a while and probably should if I ever get around to it.
Anyway, the analogy here is the most well-known characters that have been played by the same actor. Ian McKellen's best known roles are Gandalf and Magneto, and Harrison Ford's best known roles are Han Solo and Indiana Jones. Hope that clears things up.
I guess if you're a big fan, maybe it would make sense if you'd start to think of other movies first. But I'm not convinced that this is the case for everyone.
the correct person to ask about an actor's "best known" roles would be... everyone. It's not a subjective thing, it's based on general consensus. Though I'll admit I'm not perfectly satisfied with this as an analogy either.
They are also recurring roles that both actors played in different franchises. Rocky Balboa is to John Rambo as Agent Smith is to Elrond. Okay, I guess its a bit of a stretch as far as analogies go, but I still like it.
The first time I noticed McKellen was indeed from his Richard III. He was amazing. But it would have made it too hard for most people, not to mention that Gandalf, Magneto, Han Solo and Indiana Jones are all fictional characters.
I thought of "good guy and bad guy played by the same actor," which would have been an interesting analogy. But what bad guy did Ford play? Probably Han Solo is the worst guy because he was a smuggler.
And Magneto, though the antagonist, only used evil *means* to achieve his goals. His *motivation* was the same as Charles Xavier's: the acceptance of mutants by non-mutants.
Ok, the Austro-Hungarian empire.
Not an analogy - close though. The relationship between the two sets don't match.
Army is to General as Navy is to Admiral (top rank of the the service) would be one way to make it correct.
Anyway, the analogy here is the most well-known characters that have been played by the same actor. Ian McKellen's best known roles are Gandalf and Magneto, and Harrison Ford's best known roles are Han Solo and Indiana Jones. Hope that clears things up.
And Magneto, though the antagonist, only used evil *means* to achieve his goals. His *motivation* was the same as Charles Xavier's: the acceptance of mutants by non-mutants.
Plot Twist
Michael Bay is to ******ion
I laughed hard.
This analogy does not quite work; Ian McKellen has played Gandalf 6 times and Magneto 5 times, whereas Ford has played both Han Solo and Indy 5 times.