Shouldn't just "Julius" work for that answer? Got it anyway. Missed lead. Didn't know that it tasted good. No wonder kids like to eat it. paint chips. Chinese toys. Those delicious delicious toys...
Well, "Render onto Caesar the things that are Caesar's" refers to Tiberius... Or maybe Caligula, it depends on when the events depicted in the gospels happened.
I can reference lines from the Bible that treat Pharaoh as a proper name in the same way those lines seem to treat Ceasar, and a quiz that disqualifies Pharaoh as a character in the Bible under the assumption that it is a title and not a name.
So while you may be right, that doesn't seem like the strongest argument.
Well, roman names work different. In fact his given name was Gaius and Julius the name of his family (gens), with caesar being some kind of official nickname. Those names were acquired some time during your life and it was what you were commonly referred to. So people called him "Caesar" and not "Julius", close friends maybe called him "Gaius".
Same goes with Cicero, for example, his given name was Marcus and he was form the Tullian family, but the name we know him by and the romans did too is Cicero, which comes from very remarkable dimples he had, and so he called him Cicero, which can be translated as chick-pea.
Going back to Caesar, the case is a little bit different because his name was indeed also inherited by his father, whose name was also Gaius Iulius Caesar. Historians argue about the origin of the name Caesar, and we can't be sure, but it definitely was not a title during his lifetime.
Calling him Julius is like referring to Elizabeth II as Windsor.
When someone hears or reads the name 'Caesar', 9 out of 10 times they'll think about Gaius Julius Caesar and the man who conquered Gaul, first Roman to invade Britain and the guy who was basically an emperor (though he wasn't!). However, when they hear or read 'Julius', they'll most likely not think about Gaius Julius Caesar and the man who conquered Gaul, first Roman to invade Britain and the guy who was basically an emperor.
There probably wasn't enough lead in the water to do anything, which is supported by skeletal analysis. The whole "lead pipes bringing down the Roman Empire" theory was big in the 80s, partially because it was convenient way to get people in the US to start replacing lead pipes.
That said, given that Roman water systems were constant flow (unlike what we have in the US, which increases the risk of lead poisoning from pipes), I'm pretty okay with people believing that the myth.
Simple thought - If the questions are in English why would the answers be in Latin??? Poem I learned in Latin class: Latin is a language, at least it used to be. First it killed the Romans and now it's killin' me.
Given how lenient answers are, that probably should work. This is a quiz in English though and that's not what it's called by English speakers. I'm bilingual and I firmly believe it's more appropriate to pronounce words and use place names in the language being used. English is a very flexible and forgiving language, so it really doesn't much matter much so long as you're successfully conveying what you're trying to say but it's probably best to just avoid confusion in the first place.
The title should be Ancient Rome Trivia, not Ancient Roman Trivia, which suggests that these types of questions were trivia back then. Perhaps only for lead-damaged individuals.
I tried Saint/St/Santa/Sancta/Aya + Sophia/Sofia/Sofia/Sofya and didn't get the point. It is all the same place. Strictly speaking, it is no longer a church or a museum, having recently been reconverted to a mosque.
I think the question is fine as it is, since the building is clearly a Byzantine church (albeit with added minarets). The use of this particular Byzantine church has changed throughout history between church, mosque and museum - and who knows what it might become next!
Its not named after St. Sophia. Hagia Sophia means "Holy Wisdom" with its formal name being The Church of God's Holy Wisdom (according to wikipedia anyways)
2.23 left.
"I come to bury Julius, not to praise him?"
Sorry, but it's just not right
So while you may be right, that doesn't seem like the strongest argument.
Same goes with Cicero, for example, his given name was Marcus and he was form the Tullian family, but the name we know him by and the romans did too is Cicero, which comes from very remarkable dimples he had, and so he called him Cicero, which can be translated as chick-pea.
Going back to Caesar, the case is a little bit different because his name was indeed also inherited by his father, whose name was also Gaius Iulius Caesar. Historians argue about the origin of the name Caesar, and we can't be sure, but it definitely was not a title during his lifetime.
Calling him Julius is like referring to Elizabeth II as Windsor.
That said, given that Roman water systems were constant flow (unlike what we have in the US, which increases the risk of lead poisoning from pipes), I'm pretty okay with people believing that the myth.
I know like dozens of Adrian, Adrià, Adrianne, Ariadne, etc.
That H is just Evil
iupiter
traianus
hadrianus
constantinus
You scored 22/22 = 100%
6.7% of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is 15
Your high score is 22
Your fastest time is 1:54
So far my best score in any Jetpunk Quiz - other than numbers and letters speed-typing of course!
via Appia, Carthago, Byzanz, Constantin,