Salma Hayek is part Lebanese. Carlos Slim, richest man in Mexico and sometimes the world, is also part Arab. His last name is actually a perversion of "Salim."
Brazil has the largest Japanese community out of Japan in this entire world. In the neighbourhood of Liberdade, in São Paulo, you hear people speaking Japanese(and now Korean and Chinese too) everywhere.
i know that there are japanese communities in the dominican republic, i actually heard there's a town called colonia japonesa where many of the japanese in dr live. besides japan, i know there are a lot of palestinians, lebanese, jordanians and syrians in places like mexico and venezuela and that they actually influenced the culture a lot.
One is Spain: During the colonial times the Spaniards managed to make trading routes between the Philippines and its four Viceroyalties in the Americas, creating a migration route as well.
Also, towards the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th, many Asians (mostly Japanese) began to emigrate seeking for better life conditions. However, some countries began to block them (like the US and Australia), so they went to those countries that didn't blocked them (like all of South America).
To replace Africans after abolishing the transatlantic slave trade, a lot of countries instead imported Asians. Britain sent more than half a million of Asians to the West Indies, for example.
Using Wikipedia's resources across multiple pages linked to the "Demographics of Mexico" article as a rough, imperfect guide, the Arab-Mexican and Asian-Mexican populations combine to only about 1.2 million. And note that not all those of Arabic birth or descent will be of Asian geographical descent, too.
Not so baffling if for no other reason that Egypt is not entirely in Africa because of the Sinai Peninsula. Also, and probably more to the point, the remnants of mid-20th century pan-Arabism (to which Egypt has a complicated history) might lead to the reasonable conclusion that Arabs from the Asian continent who live in Egypt now (or the descendants of such immigrants) aren't part of a "diaspora" but are rather migrants within a cross-border Arabic meta-culture (cf. how Brits who move to Australia are not considered to be comprising any diaspora).
Interesting point @kal. But I would disagree with the addition of Egypt. At some point after the Arab conquest the Arabs mixed with the native Egyptians to form a new cultural group. Certainly this new cultural group originated on the continent of Africa. DNA-wise, I'd hazard a guess that most of the DNA comes from ancient Egyptians.
Nobody even knows who the ancient Egyptians were or if they have any surviving descendants. Nubians? Arabs? Levantines? Some indigenous people? We know Cleopatra and her family were Greek, but she's not usually considered "ancient." They've extracted a bit of partial DNA from some 12th dynasty mummies and found a bit that is probably sub-Saharan African but it's far from a complete picture.
That's all beside the point, though. At which point does a person cease being someone's descendant because the majority of their other ancestors have been placed in some other category? Most of my ancestors were not Native American, but I don't feel like that makes me any less a descendant of my Cherokee great grandmother.
^further confusing things, the modern-day word "Greek" doesn't really mean the same thing that it did in Cleopatra's day. People today have this problem of assuming that ethnic groups that exist today were relevant in the past. They weren't. They're barely even relevant today. Populations of humans are *not* and never have been discrete or cogent except for those periods when they move to an island somewhere and become totally isolated. Egyptians, being at the crossroads of civilization as they are, and also at the edge of two "continents," are a stark illustration of this fact.
Add to that the significant Turkish population and percentages of people of Chinese and Vietnamese descent that correspond to those in other European countries, and I reckon the Netherlands won't have been far off making the list.
What's the definition of Asian people for the purpose of this quiz? And what is the definition of an Asian country? Because I'm absolutely sure that, depending on the definition, Russia would make the list, even if you exclude the Asian part of it.
I guess Turkey and Russia are excluded from this quiz because they're not "countries outside of Asia". Otherwise yeah, even in European Turkey there's surely more than 1.7 million of people of Turkic or Kurdish decent. And European Russia has plenty of Armenians, Kalmyks, Azeris etc, without even touching e.g. the Turkic or Uralic people from Volga region.
Madagascar might be an interesting case. Groups like Merina number over 5 million, are genetically primarily Asian, but aren't fully Asian. Wonder if this should be a caveat or a grey box.
Also, towards the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th, many Asians (mostly Japanese) began to emigrate seeking for better life conditions. However, some countries began to block them (like the US and Australia), so they went to those countries that didn't blocked them (like all of South America).
That's all beside the point, though. At which point does a person cease being someone's descendant because the majority of their other ancestors have been placed in some other category? Most of my ancestors were not Native American, but I don't feel like that makes me any less a descendant of my Cherokee great grandmother.
I'm surprised that there were so many South American countries.
Aren't they part of Oceania?