It's inaccurate to say we can't figure out the shape of our galaxy. Of course we can't see it from the outside but by knowing the distances and positions of stars we can map it out.
^ We may have mapped it accurately by now as I was going on an episode from QI from several years ago.
I'm still not completely convinced that we do know though - it's a bit like saying that you can tell the shape of a forest that you are standing in by knowing the distance and direction to each tree. It's true, but it's a very slow process collecting the data
The problem is that we can't see most of the stars in the Milky Way because of the interstellar dust. If we could see them all, of course we'd know the structure of the galaxy. Since we can only see the local region, the best we can do is compare its dynamics with those of regions of other galaxies. It's a bit like working out the layout of a house when you're locked in one room, but can see other houses across the street, which may, or may not, have similar rooms.
Nova is actually a different type of event - the gradual accretion of material onto a white dwarf, for example, can cause a nuclear firestorm - a nova - where all the excess material burns off, and this can happen many times in a recurrent nova system where the white dwarf has a red giant companion it can siphon material off of. There are also type 1A supernovae, which is when in the same sort of system the white dwarf draws of enough mass from its companion to tip itself over the Chandrasekhar limit, or 1.4 solar masses. At this point it collapses further to become a neutron star, releasing a huge amount of energy in the process. For the supernova that most people know, that is a type 2 supernova - death of a high-mass star caused by the fusion of iron in the star's core.
One of d BEST QUIZZES EVER!i needed more time 2 put Kepler....any way d best quiz I ever played is this.its really appreciable quizmaster.i really enjoyed
Nope, Nova is when there is a sudden runaway fusion reaction of hydrogen on a White Dwarf, appearing only in Binary Star Systems. Supernova is the actual explosion of a star, which only happens to Red Giants.
No, nova is a term referring to a phenomenon in a binary star system. It's complicated, but basically one of the stars will become a red giant, leaving behind a white dwarf "core" that is pulled into its orbit. The remaining star will start to shed hydrogen which will eventually fall out of its gravitational pull and onto the dwarf. This will cause the appearance of a "new star." Eventually the dwarf will be pulled into the other star and the nova will end.
I tried every color preceding "dwarf" and couldn't get it. I'm sure the answer is right, as I am not expert in astronomy, but I am proud to at least see a comment confirming that I did not completely invent that dwarves are among the densest stars.
I’m back here three years later… to be fair I’m not sure if the IAU had actually made “Sirius” the official name of the star at the time. No star naming was ever “official” until 2015 I believe.
Reply because edit isn’t working on mobile: I just checked, Sirius was “officially named” in 2016. So yes, there wouldn’t be any reason to say anything other than that
Could inflation be accepted for the cosmic expansion one? Of course Big Bang is an acceptable answer but the huge expansion you see when you look at a timeline of the universe in today's models and which you were probsbly referring to) is actually the inflation. It occurred 10^-30s after the Big Bang which is t=0.
And I kind of second the suggestion to accept c for speed of light though it's a boring 1-letter answer, as it is a fundamental constant which would exist even in a world without light, and actually everything (light, the Earth, your dog...) move at that speed in spacetime. The question is, when u set a reference frame, how much is converted into time movement and how much goes to space movement. But speed of light (in vacuum) is correct too.
These are just suggestions. I like this quiz as it is now too.
Quizmaster, please change the name ''Iron'' in question of surface of Mars, because it's not iron, but rust. Sorry for bad english, because i'm Polish.
It's surprising that more people guessed "Sea of Tranquility" than what I'd previously thought'd be more common, Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky.
space is my thing
J1407B has a ring system 200 times larges than saturns...
Gliese 667C rains glass...
55 Cancri E is basically a diamond...
Wasp 12 B is being evaporated...
Alpha Centauri B is the nearest...
did I go too far?
He does tend to bend the truth to try to trick Alan though.
I'm still not completely convinced that we do know though - it's a bit like saying that you can tell the shape of a forest that you are standing in by knowing the distance and direction to each tree. It's true, but it's a very slow process collecting the data
Also you could accept "c" for the speed of light. :)
Been into astrophysics since I was 8.
Could inflation be accepted for the cosmic expansion one? Of course Big Bang is an acceptable answer but the huge expansion you see when you look at a timeline of the universe in today's models and which you were probsbly referring to) is actually the inflation. It occurred 10^-30s after the Big Bang which is t=0.
And I kind of second the suggestion to accept c for speed of light though it's a boring 1-letter answer, as it is a fundamental constant which would exist even in a world without light, and actually everything (light, the Earth, your dog...) move at that speed in spacetime. The question is, when u set a reference frame, how much is converted into time movement and how much goes to space movement. But speed of light (in vacuum) is correct too.
These are just suggestions. I like this quiz as it is now too.