As an American, US cities come easily. There are a lot of them though, which shows how wealthy the US really is. Same can be said about China. Other countries rely mostly on their capitals for their profits, like Taiwan, Bangladesh, South Korea, and Mexico, since their tourism would also be high. Chicago is generally an easier city in the US to get on quizzes, unlike maybe Seattle.
Isn't it one of the poorest parts of the country, Berlin? Or at least one of the poorest cities? I seem to remember hearing something like that recently.
Fukuoka is the biggest city on Kyushu island, surrounded by the third- or fourth-largest urban area in Japan. Chongqing is one of the four direct-administered municipalities in China, and the second largest (they claim themselves to be the largest) city in western China. Busan is the second largest city in South Korea. All these are pretty easy for east asia inhabitants.
I like how this has turned into an argument about the 5 biggest cities in America. I was always taught this: New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix.
Funny. I have always thought NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia as the top 5. Maybe depends on what the list was when you were in elementary school? Past the top 3, they do change over time.
I would probably give New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Dallas if asked. The top 3 are pretty well ahead of the rest, but according to the 2019 MSA estimate, Dallas, Houston, DC, Miami, Philadelphia, and Atlanta are all in the 7.5 to 6 million range.
Having far more people than London or Los Angeles helps. As does being the capital of one of the world's largest economies at the heart of one of the major global regions for trade and industry.
For the record, Wikipedia (citing Korean government sources) lists Seoul as the world's fourth largest metropolitan area. WorldAtlas.com lists it as the fifth largest. South Korea's per capita GDP of $35,000 would certainly imply, given Seoul's enormous population, that it should be one of the world's largest city economies.
The way Seoul looks on something like Google Maps always amazes me. It's as if almost a quarter of the land area of the whole country is covered by its urban area and the cities contiguous with it. Compare it with London and the contrast is pretty stark (thank you green belt!)
The GDP of the entire country of Nigeria is only 500 billion or so. Seeing as the Lagos area has about 10% of the population of the country, it's likely that Lagos is not close to making the list.
I got all of those. Busan used to be the headquarters for global megacorporation Samsung (I think they've since moved to Seoul), and it is still a major industrial center.
Considering that it's the hub of the gargantuan and once-hegemonic American auto industry, the fact that it is now in last place on a top 50 list is a bit of a shame and indicative of how far the city has fallen.
I missed some obvious ones (got every Chinese city on here except for Beijing). I am skeptical of some of these figures, though. Is Brussels really that large? Belgium's per capita GDP is only 80% of Australia's and Brussels' metro population is 1.8 million vs 4.9 million for Sydney. I expect Sydney is disproportionately wealthy compared to Australia and to a greater extent than the same may apply to Brussels vs Belgium as a whole. Given this it seems rather remarkable that Brussels has a larger economy than Sydney. Also, what's happening with Germany? German cities much smaller than Berlin make it on, but the capital itself doesn't. Is it really that much poorer than the rest of Germany? Berlin has about twice Hamburg's population - is Hamburg more than twice as wealthy?
Maybe Brussels has some profit from the EU headquarters being there. I wonder if the central location between Paris, the Netherlands and western Germany helps? And the rail link to London.
Super interesting quiz - good work QM, learned a lot from that, with some surprises.
Most definitions of urban areas are liberal. In the U.S., Dallas and Forth Worth, San Jose to Oakland, Washington to Baltimore, Los Angeles to pretty much anywhere in its region are all around that distance. Hell, I grew up in a town 35 miles from Atlanta and people would still say they were "from Atlanta."
Yes, it is very much a North-American or Australian view of an urban area. An American's "liberal" idea of an urban area is a European's idea of "several urban areas" I suspect.
^ true. A city is a really loose definition and can have many different outcomes depending on how you look at it. For example, an easy way would be the city's metropolitan area, but many other places start to merge in, Such as Washington - Baltimore or Dallas - Forth Worth, and then you could just keep adding in towns and villages that straddle the area. Another way would be the actual city, but then London would have a population of around 7,000, as the London metropolitan area is made up of boroughs that are actually UK counties, with only the city of London being an actuall 'city'. It's difficult to have 1 straight idea of a city's population, because different sources use different definitions, and it ends up with big debates, as everyone has different ideas from looking at different sources. I think metropolitan area is the best way, but it still does have problems. Woah I wrote loads :D
Exactly. It’s why nobody can ever agree on what the 4th and 5th largest US cities are. Is it Houston and Phily? Dallas and Houston? Houston and Phoenix? Dallas and Phily? DC and Dallas? and the list goes on and on.
Why is Amsterdam/Rotterdam count as only 1 city when it's two different ones! The Netherlands isn't that big and they are "only" about 50km apart from each other but that doesn't mean it can be count as 1!
No. Unfortunately the Brookings institute decided not to share their data when they released their 2018 report. The report actually kind of sucks because they only show changes, not the actual values.
In SND (Suzhou New District)!! I now live interchangeably between two houses - one a flat, and the other with a front and back garden (part of a flat as well, but with much fewer stories). I live in the flat during weekdays when I have to go to school (because my school bus only travels a certain route), and in the house during the weekends and other non-schooldays.
Never knew Shanghai, Wuxi, and Suzhou were different metropolitan regions. When I just looked on Google maps it seemed fishy, but flipping to satellite mode revealed clear suburban walls separating the three.
These figures combines financial economy and real economy (goods and services produced). I don't think London and New York would rank high without financial economies. One have to bear in mind that many banks have their headquarters in London city for secrecy reasons (ability to avoid taxes in tax havens in Cayman islands etc.) and New York because proximity for Wallstreet. Big part of this money goes to speculative derivatives, which are more "productive" in financial sense than investing in real economies in UK or US. In contrast in China there are trillions of dollars invested in building infrastructure and services: high speed railroads, cities, hospitals, schools etc. I have traveled almost 60 countries in world including exotic places like North Korea and lived in China for years but nothing is as horrible as roads and rail roads in UK and USA. They are like 21 years ago in China, when I was there for the first time. Even Japan's high speed rail looks ancient compared to Chinese.
Had a look at the ghost cities in China yet? Not all is as it seems in China.
The US definitely has its own financial house of cards with all the dollar printing in the last 2 years, but China has similar issues with their financial system.
Well – the largest economies characterised by lots of different, well-defined cities. Interesting that Germany is the fourth-largest economy in the world but doesn't actually have any specific cities on the list, presumably because their economic activity is spread (unevenly) across the country rather than in many discrete urban centres.
It's off the list this year, but shouldn't be a surprise. MSP has >3M people, high average income, and is home to more Fortune 500 companies than most people realize. (UnitedHealth, 3M, Target, BestBuy, General Mills, etc.)
Surprised that Dhaka makes the list over Cairo, Johannesburg, Tehran, and Kuala Lumpur; cities in the same ballpark of population but in countries two to three times as rich as Bangladesh
I wonder if it's because in each of those countries there are other large or influential cities (Alexandria, Cape Town, Tabriz, lots in Malaysia) whereas in Bangladesh it's all about Dhaka. That is a totally unscientific guess.
Kuala Lumpur has about 9.1 million people and Johannesburg has 8.4 million--nowhere near Dhaka's 21 million. I highly doubt Cairo is richer than Dhaka (although I still did think it would make this list). Not sure about Tehran. If you visit Dhaka though, you'll see that it's bustling and rapidly growing, catching up to similarly sized Indian cities like Delhi. And as Kalbahamut says below, it's the center of one of the world's largest garment industries, which is one of the reasons why it is growing so much economically.
I think that might be a new addition with the last update? But, also... it's a city of 22 million people and more or less capital of the international garment manufacturing industry at this point.
How does Riyadh not make the list? Even assuming Riyadh, the country's main economic hub only has the same per capita GDP as the country as a whole, we get:
Saudi GDP (PPP) per capita: $55,368
Riyadh population (2018): 7,676,654
With the power of multiplication we get a rough figure of $425 billion.
I always pass by Hangzhou and Nanjing because I thought they're too small. Especially with other Chinese giants like Tianjin or Chengdu not on the list.
Note that we are using the Purchasing Power Parity numbers.
Also, as usual, we filled in the "loosely-defined" Ruhr area.
Great quiz, thanks!
Fun Fact: without Berlin the Germany economy would do even better.
Super interesting quiz - good work QM, learned a lot from that, with some surprises.
Does Brussels include Ghent and Antwerp as well???
All very odd.
The US definitely has its own financial house of cards with all the dollar printing in the last 2 years, but China has similar issues with their financial system.
good for you minny
Saudi GDP (PPP) per capita: $55,368
Riyadh population (2018): 7,676,654
With the power of multiplication we get a rough figure of $425 billion.