I live in Dallas. See? I technically don't but I say I do because nobody knows what Plano is, outside of DFW of course. See? I did it again! Because it's one metro area!
The government defined "metropolitan" areas often contain enormous physical areas of rural land and thoroughly separate urban areas. China and the U.S. are notoriously bad for inflated population numbers in a "metro" area.
The U.S. Census does tabulate actual urbnaized areas, which often differ greatly. However, they bafflingly break down a few solidly continual urban areas such as Los Angeles and San Francisco into several urban areas, which leaves an underrepresentation of overall urban population. Go figure.
Yes, San Francisco/Oakland and San Jose are usually counted as two separate metro areas. Same with Los Angeles/Anaheim and Riverside. But both examples are really one urban area each.
Using just city population major world cities get reduced to small towns and expanses of suburban sprawl get turned into large cities. Metropolitan population much more closely reflects the real world reality than arbitrary and imaginary lines around cities. Take California - using city population San Francisco is just two Bakersfields. Go to one and then the other - that patently does not reflect the realities. In Australia the warping of reality is even plainer. What are the five largest cities in Australia? You might think Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide. Going by official city population it's Brisbane, Gold Coast, Moreton Bay, Canterbury, Central Coast.
Well, you're confusing the City of London with London. I still believe, that city populations are the better measurements. It is easy, to take the population of nearby cities into accountance, but figuring out, where a metro area ends or beginns is far harder and often arbitrary. City population may be counterintuitiv in many instances, but it is far more precise.
Some metro and urban areas have multiple highly populated cities, but people often only know the main core city, like Mexico City.
How many people know all the cities within all the urban or metro areas in the world?
City populations can also be misleading. Spokane city has a population of about 230,000. The urban area is about 447,000. Even the metro area is only 600,000. Salt Lake City, on the other hand, has a smaller population of 200,000. However, its urban area is about 1.2 million, and the metro area is 1.3 million, and practically speaking, the urban area could include Provo-Orem, putting the population over 2 million.
Why is Accra, Ghana not on the list? citypopulation.de lists the metro area at over 4 million, and English is both the official language and the lingua franca.
Because it is about cities with English as the most commonly-spoken *first* language. Many people speak English in Accra, but most speak it as their second language, I would assume.
The greater Manchester urban area consists of Manchester, Bolton, Sale, Rochdale, Stockport and Salford, plus lots of smaller ares that bring it up to 3 million. Manchester itself only has 514 thousand.
Man, doing urban area rather than city proper really makes a difference. Miami city proper has somewhat more than 600,000. Its urban area is practically ten times that.
Should accept San Jose, the city itself is larger than San Francisco and is as much the central city of the Bay Area as San Francisco. Also should accept St Paul, it is comparable in size to Minneapolis and is almost always mentioned together, twin cities or Minneapolis/St Paul.
I was very doubtful about Durban, but in the 2011 census 49.75% gave English as their first language, when in 2001 it was only 29%. So I guess that is enough to count for this quiz.
Singapore should be included. According Wikipedia (which in turn cites a reliable source), 36.9% speak English as the "language most frequently spoken at home", just ahead of Mandarin at 34.9%. By your criteria that makes it a city where English is the most spoken first language. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore#Languages
So I take it that Singapore population figure takes in Johor Bahru too? Cos it is quite a bit bigger than the population of the Republic of Singapore. I suspect with it included, Mandarin once again overtakes English as the most spoken first language, though I can't find precise figures for Johor Bahru to get the totals for the whole metro area.
Same with the netherlands, though it is not what is spoken at home. (though it does seems to go to english more and more. A lot of sentences sneak in. Kids 4 year old say ready set go, before they do something like race eachother. Instead of a phrase that has allways been used here, (klaar voor de start, af). And I can give you many many more examples, little kids talk to eachother and their parents in english for fun. But like I said above, a lot of everyday sentences have been replaced by english ones.
Not just kids. Saying "ready?" When you are about to leave and waiting for the other person, is normal and used as much as the dutch version by adults. "Nice" has replaced its counterpart. "No way!" is normal. The list is rather big. So I'll stop now ;)
You would be safe to add Accra. Most people in Ghana speak English, and most English speakers use it as their primary language. No other African language comes close in terms of exclusive use. However, Accra and Kumasi aren't populous enough to make the list.
It could still be the most commonly spoken first language. When other languages have a lower percentage. (since several languages are spoke there. 27% english speaking does not mean that 73% speaks ONE other language, but the 73% is all the other languages together)
I noticed that too. I think it might be that they were in descending order when the quiz was created in 2014, but since then, the population figures have been updated without reordering them.
I expected Jacksonville to be here instead of Miami bc Miami is infested with spanish speakers while Jacksonville has a higher population and over there I’ve seen more English speakers
Much has been written on the topic and I'll just add to it. If we are stating "first-language", South African cities are not likely to be included (even taking in the concentration in cities). However, if it is about what is mostly spoken or understood including 2nd level or non-native, South Africa (and others) might very well be on this list.
i mean singapore and the other south african cities like johannesburg and cape town are technically true there can also be many others in those cities that also speak different languages, for example singapore also speaks mandarin, tamil, and malay, while south africa also speaks, afrikaans, zulu, xhosa, swazi, etc
Just a minor nitpick, but I think the caveat is wrong in saying that there are no major urban areas in the US where English is not the most common first language, because of San Juan.
The U.S. Census does tabulate actual urbnaized areas, which often differ greatly. However, they bafflingly break down a few solidly continual urban areas such as Los Angeles and San Francisco into several urban areas, which leaves an underrepresentation of overall urban population. Go figure.
How many people know all the cities within all the urban or metro areas in the world?
City populations can also be misleading. Spokane city has a population of about 230,000. The urban area is about 447,000. Even the metro area is only 600,000. Salt Lake City, on the other hand, has a smaller population of 200,000. However, its urban area is about 1.2 million, and the metro area is 1.3 million, and practically speaking, the urban area could include Provo-Orem, putting the population over 2 million.
Not just kids. Saying "ready?" When you are about to leave and waiting for the other person, is normal and used as much as the dutch version by adults. "Nice" has replaced its counterpart. "No way!" is normal. The list is rather big. So I'll stop now ;)