Population
|
City or Town
|
10,552,913
|
London
|
2,737,412
|
Manchester
|
2,594,803
|
Birmingham
|
1,877,125
|
Leeds
|
1,026,880
|
Glasgow
|
895,385
|
Liverpool
|
888,340
|
Southampton
|
790,461
|
Newcastle
|
|
Population
|
City or Town
|
761,541
|
Nottingham
|
692,851
|
Sheffield
|
680,527
|
Bristol
|
622,000
|
Belfast
|
559,367
|
Leicester
|
529,580
|
Edinburgh
|
494,419
|
Brighton and Hove
|
490,037
|
Bournemouth
|
|
Population
|
City or Town
|
464,269
|
Cardiff
|
389,603
|
Coventry
|
383,552
|
Middlesbrough
|
382,687
|
Stoke-on-Trent
|
355,440
|
Reading
|
334,224
|
Sunderland
|
331,350
|
Birkenhead
|
328,859
|
Preston
|
|
Dear Dear
356,500 - Preston
According to the quiz, never
Their lives for them?
Their fantasies daily?
We need to know, damn it.
I live near Reading but I still forgot...
even tho im british
i missed PORTSMOUTH
aaaaaaaah
but then i got it :)
I had just made an updated quiz back in january before the update:)
I guess I just assumed it would be included with Liverpool? Looking at only 800k for Liverpool it does make sense now though
It's the most egregious citypopulation.de change from the ONS's more generic names for built-up areas. 'South Hampshire' is not only more neutral, but more descriptive.
definitely could have gotten a few more...
I'd argue that all these (Wirral, Teesside, South Hampshire, etc) should be type ins - not least as its what the source's source uses.
Greater Manchester is a very different concept to the Manchester urban area (not metropolitan area - which is yet another thing, though much more nebulous in definition) listed here. The former is administrative geography, the latter is physical geography (where buildings are). Wigan is in the former, not the latter. Wilmslow in the latter but not the former.
I was so close lol. Just missed one