If my capital is named after a victorious general at Waterloo (which I hadn't known until now), that is ridiculously obscure. Kiwis had better get that name changed!
All levels of school have much better things to do than teaching the minutiae of the Napoleonic Wars. Jerry's an intelligent guy. And humble enough not to feel threatened by not knowing some aspect of trivia.
Not knowing about napoleonic wars (in any detail) is one thing. But not knowing who your capital is named after.. That is like people not knowing washington dc is named after george washington. You dont have to know stuff about the person, just "some general, or some president" would be enough.
If your capital is named after a person you'd think you would know it. If it is named after something else, it is a bit more understandable, cause you dont stop and think "hmm, who was that". Though imo I would make sense to atleast wonder about it. (All regardless of what you are taught at your school)
Well, if your argument is that Blucher deserves the recognition as much as Wellington (if not more so), I agree. But why would the british name a city after a german general?
Edit: I just realized I'm answering to a two year old post. :P
Audibly "huh!" 'd after reading Tripoli. I never thought about it before and just would have assumed it had an Arabic etymology if I actually did think about it for a second.
Ottawa : To trade. Adawe in Algonquian language. Comes from the name of natives who were trading along the river Outaouais near the actual capital of Canada.
Paris isn't that prominent in the Iliad, despite having helped kick off the war. I was going "Hector, Achilles, Agamemnon, these people don't have cities!"
Sure, there's a myth associated with it, but that myth came about afterwards. Scholars generally agree it's more likely that she was named for the city, as -ene was a common ending for place names, but very rare for given names. She was referred to as Pallas Athenaie, or "the Pallas of Athens," and she's referred to elsewhere in early texts as "the Mistress of Athens." [Source]
Paris threw me off way harder than it should. It is quite obvious in retrospect, but there is a legend, that Lisbon was named after/by Ulysses, and it is also probably named after a tribe in reality, so that was all I could think of.
I don't know if this is anything to do with the confusion, but in Spanish versions of the Bible the Apostle James is called Santiago. Compare these New Testament books in Spanish and in English:
... Hebreos - Santiago - 1 Pedro - 2 Pedro - 1 Juan ...
... Hebrews - James - 1 Peter - 2 Peter - 1 John ...
I don't know why James gets pre-emptive sainthood in Spanish but in the Bible James = Santiago.
But, Lincoln wasn't the first President (admittedly, the question may have been changed since the comment was made). Without the "first" provision, there are four US state capitals named for presidents - although in one case the namesake was a war hero at the time the city was named, becoming president later (Jackson, MS).
Again, why is La Paz considered a capital city but The Hague isn't? The Bolivian constitution doesn't mention La Paz at all, simply stating, "Sucre es la Capital de Bolivia" (article 6, paragraph 1 - and that's all that is said about the capital city in the whole document).
Either Both are capitals or neither is, there's no difference in status with both simply being seats of government rather than capitals.
Seen and mentioned this inconsistency over a very long time...
I just turn off the timer if I want more time to think, I don't care that much about the points. But I agree, many quizzes here should give some more time. Speed typing quizzes aren't interesting, imo.
If your capital is named after a person you'd think you would know it. If it is named after something else, it is a bit more understandable, cause you dont stop and think "hmm, who was that". Though imo I would make sense to atleast wonder about it. (All regardless of what you are taught at your school)
Edit: I just realized I'm answering to a two year old post. :P
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/75765/capital-city-etymologies-map-quiz
... Hebreos - Santiago - 1 Pedro - 2 Pedro - 1 Juan ...
... Hebrews - James - 1 Peter - 2 Peter - 1 John ...
I don't know why James gets pre-emptive sainthood in Spanish but in the Bible James = Santiago.
The 'T' in Tiago and the 'D' in Diego are remnants from the 'Saint' epithet: in Old Castilian it was "Sant Iaco".
The name originally comes from Jacob. Some interesting extra details:
http://etimologias.dechile.net/?Santiago
https://www.elperiodicomediterraneo.com/opinion/2012/07/19/santiago-jaime-42111047.html
CLICK HERE
Either Both are capitals or neither is, there's no difference in status with both simply being seats of government rather than capitals.
Seen and mentioned this inconsistency over a very long time...