In the 1980s Japanese car makers made big inroads into the American auto market by selling cars that were cheap, small, economy cars. These cars sold so well that soon all Japanese cars in America had the reputation for being this way. In order to get away from this image of selling cheap economical POS cars, when they started bringing slightly higher-end models to the US they did so under different brand names. Honda created Acura. Toyota created Lexus. Nissan created Infiniti. and so on.
You are correct. Also Mazda was ready to jump on the luxury bandwagon....when they intended to launch the "Amati" (i believe it was going to be called) brand. The first model developed for the brand was the milennia. Of couree due to ensuing financial difficulties...plans for mazda's own luxury marque were killed. However Mazda still had this new upscale model of vehicle on their hands and decided to "cut their losses" and to position this new model and sell it as their flagship model....the Mazda Milennia.
All true, but the Acura brand name was restricted to North America. In the rest of the world they were sold as Hondas.
Also in Australia in the 70s, Chrysler sold a Charger under the brand name Valiant. Was a 2 door "muscle" car competing against the Holden Monaro and Ford Falcon/Cobra
It was the 70s when the Japanese automakers invaded America with their tiny, affordable, fuel-efficient cars like the Honda Civic and Toyota Tercel. And the only POS's among them were the all unreliable, brokedown Ford Pintos and Escorts and Chevy Chevettes and Citations that the Japanese models had supplanted.
eh.. while it's true that American cars in the late 70s and early 80s were notoriously bad and Hondas, etc gained a reputation for being very reliable by comparison and this was among their selling points, I have a hard time looking at a first or second generation Honda Civic and calling it something other than a POS. It might have had a reliable engine but it was tiny and uncomfortable, the interior was made of cheap plastic, door handles would crack and break off in your hand, they were ugly as hell... there were issues other than engine reliability. The Japanese weren't running away from nothing when they created these other brands.
Fourthed. If the Quiz is intended to be North American brands only, it should say so in the description or preferably the title. If not, then Honda needs to be accepted as correct.
Most Japanese cars still are crap in the fit and finish and handling departments. The engine will last forever, but the car around them sucks worse than others.
This probably needs to be unAmericanised. Honda should be accepted for anything Acura and Holden/Vauxhall for Chevrolet (or GM brands that are exported).
Also in Australia in the 70s, Chrysler sold a Charger under the brand name Valiant. Was a 2 door "muscle" car competing against the Holden Monaro and Ford Falcon/Cobra
They started as a Honda and remained so for most of the world.