But Tenochtitlan was a massive, heavily populated, highly organised city when Cortes set his eyes on it. It's just a daft answer to a quiz about supposed personal founders of cities. It's even more daft given the fact that Cortez actually did found Veracruz in the same year. Refounding sounds like what I do with my car keys every morning.
Agree. He conquered the city and took control over it, but in the early years the Spanish depended heavily on the structures of power of the Aztecs to control the population.
"the Crown demonstrated concern to protect the status of the nobles, to grant them privileges, favours and goods. It did so as much through respect for the established order - whatever its origin - as because it could not do without these all too precious intermediaries on whom depended the collection of the tribute and the obedience of populations." Serge Gruzinski, The Conquest of Mexico (1993: 64-67)
"With perhaps 75,000 Indian inhabitants in the mid-1550s, compared to a Spanish population of approximately 8,000, postconquest Mexico City was still very much an Indian entity, a fact the Spaniards must have
recognized. They were still calling their capital Tenochtitlán in the 1520s and Tenochtitlán-México in the 1530s." Ida Altman, Spanish Society in Mexico City After the Conquest in Hispanic American Historical Review (1991) 71 (3): 413–445.
For instance, this is a great quizz! Thanks.
I like the founding story of Tenochtitlan, but there isnt one founder for it so I see why its not on the list.
"the Crown demonstrated concern to protect the status of the nobles, to grant them privileges, favours and goods. It did so as much through respect for the established order - whatever its origin - as because it could not do without these all too precious intermediaries on whom depended the collection of the tribute and the obedience of populations." Serge Gruzinski, The Conquest of Mexico (1993: 64-67)
"With perhaps 75,000 Indian inhabitants in the mid-1550s, compared to a Spanish population of approximately 8,000, postconquest Mexico City was still very much an Indian entity, a fact the Spaniards must have
(although I'm technically higher up than you by latitude)