I put Tunis then assumed it must be another similar story somewhere else. Carthage is a suburb of Tunis now, and their history has been one and the same for a very long time.
I get that they were founded differently though, so even though it might be confusing to some (i.e. me) it's probably best left as it is.
The Berber's didn't quite intend for it to be "as much land as can be encircled by an oxhide cut into strips" – they tried to short-change her by just saying it was the amount of land that could be covered by an oxhide, i.e. not very much. Dido then outsmarted them by cutting it into fine strips, and therefore holding them to their word, claimed enough land to build a new city*.
*It's obviously all nonsense, but that's how the story goes.
Please accept Tunis for Carthage, they share the same urban area. Just like Istanbul is accepted but in the past this was Byzantium and Constantinople.
It's not the same. Istanbul, Constantinople and Byzantium are the same city, just renamed. Tunis and Carthage are two different cities, but one later grew to incorporate the other. It would be like saying that Jersey or Newark were founded by the Dutch settlers.
You should replace the Mexico City question with the eagle and snake story regarding the founding of Tenochtitlan. Much more interesting and more difficult.
I refuse to believe that 54% of people knew Bath. I didn't even know 54% of people on Jetpunk knew the city of Bath even existed... How is this basically the same percentage as one of the most well known cities in Italy, Venice?!
I get that they were founded differently though, so even though it might be confusing to some (i.e. me) it's probably best left as it is.
*It's obviously all nonsense, but that's how the story goes.
Just one note, the Strait of Gibraltar was called the Pillars of Heracles, not Hercules.