I has an extremely high human population giving the carrying capacity of the land. Upwards of 95% of the forest has been cleared since the 1950s and poor agricultural practices have all but destroyed the topsoil in most of the country unfortunately
I bet a lot more go to the Sahara and the Serengeti and Kilimanjaro than go to the war-torn failed states that are given due to lack of info.
This isn't a very fulfilling quiz TBH, since the major countries you expect to see on the list can't be included on the list. Not much that can be done about it, that's just how it is...
And at one point, the tourist ministry (which issues required permits) told me I was the only tourist currently in Equatorial Guinea. (It does have foreign oilfield workers, though.)
I'd say India's inclusion is a combination of four things. 1. the arcane and overly difficult process involved in obtaining a tourist visa. 2. being somewhat isolated geographically from the areas where most international tourists come from. 3. Hostile relations with most of their neighbors means not that many people coming from Bangladesh, Pakistan, or Myanmar. 4. and most importantly... the enormous population of India. But there are definitely a lot of tourists there.
I haven't been in two years but my India visa was a piece of cake. Online. Flew into Delhi. Waited in line for 10 minutes and off I went. Like you, I am an American. Perhaps it has changed since 2 years ago.
I was there more than 2 years ago. It may have gotten simpler since I went. When I went I don't believe that online processing was an option- that would have saved me a ton of hassle.
While I'd love to visit the many cultural attractions that India has too offer, I'll probably never go there. For a westerner such as myself, the chance of gastroenteritis is nearly 100%. Combined with the intense crowds, it makes for a very uncomfortable trip. Maybe I'll visit Goa or Kerala some day..
I don't think #3 is entirely true. It's true for Pakistan and maybe Myanmar (not sure about it), but travel between India and Bangladesh is pretty common, both by airplane and by people crossing the border every day. This quiz can attest to that: https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/218538/countries-that-visit-india-the-most
Otherwise the rest of arguments make sense to me, especially considering population
Also if you've ever been Kolkata, there are a lot of Bengalis from Bangladesh there. Unfortunately majority of them are under the poverty line and probably have no legal residential status and not on any census data.
@limesus, it's a bit more complicated than that. The first Prime Minister, Sheikh Mujib, was very pro-India, but he was assassinated in 1975, and his successors, who were more conservative Muslims, were less so.
Today, relations with India are kinda mixed. There are occasional tensions due to water-sharing agreements and border disputes, and Modi is not very popular among the majority Muslim population of Bangladesh. At the same time, Indian cultural influence is abundant (especially with Bollywood movies/music) and the two countries are very economically integrated with each other. Also, the current PM is the daughter of Sheikh Mujib, so she has pursued many of her father's policies. While relations aren't always great, I'd say India is on better terms with Bangladesh than most of its other neighbors (especially Pakistan and China).
I went to Moldova expecting to like it there but... gotta admit it was boring as heck. Drove around Chisinau several nights looking for something, anything, to do and often all I would find were some guys sitting outside a gas station in plastic chairs. But Belarus wasn't that bad. I know it's the 2nd hardest place in Europe to get a visa to (after Russia), but I enjoyed my time there. Pretty sad that they can't even beat Somalia, Yemen, Syria or Iraq...
If you arrive and depart from the Minsk Airport and have travel insurance that covers Belarus, it's possible to stay there for five days without a visa. I think you can stay longer if you are a citizen of certain countries (mostly former CIS and Middle East). Also, the last I checked, there were no border formalities whatsoever between Belarus and Russia, so I don't think the visa regime can be the major cause for a low number of tourists.
Just a note that "no border formalities" in this case means that foreigners generally aren't allowed to cross the border between Belarus and Russia (except flying apparently if you have both valid visas), because you absolutely need a stamp when entering and exiting each country.
I went to Belarus few months ago and didn't need a visa to enter the country (remained less the 5 days limit for visa-less entry)...The only administrative demand from the country's administration was to register to their national health insurance for the duration of my stay, registration at Minsk airport. Otherwise, I must say I also enjoyed my stay there.
On the latest date, there are more than 1M tourist a year in Madagascar, which I happen to live. Although it's not a lot for a 30M people country, it's definitely bigger than what is written here.
AND I advise everybody to come and visit here! Its a wondeful and unique place.
You are preaching to the converted, my sister has been there many times as part of her job with the World Bank. She says it is extremely beautiful and loves going there. CAR on the other hand, (scatology centre).
Madagascar had 257,000 visitors in 2018 according to the UNWTO. Keep in mind that it's an island, which probably explains why such an interesting country is on this list.
Last month I've been there for 9 days and I can't talk about say Indians, but I saw perhaps 8 Western-looking people - more than I expected. But considering the 100000 Bangladeshis I could have met in the streets, it certainly is not much...
Exciting! It's somewhat disappointing to see it so low. I know it's not a country that gets a lot of positive publicity, and it certainly isn't the most ideal or exciting place to visit, but there are some areas that are truly beautiful, especially in the countryside. There are also plenty of historical sites to visit, and it's certainly much safer to visit than many of the other countries on this list.
(To be fair though, population probably has a lot to do with it. I'm guessing Bangladesh would fare better than many countries on this list if it were based on absolute numbers of tourists)
To Quizmaster. Ok my wife is Indian (I am ethnically English) which may make a difference but you must go to India. The chances of gastric problems are tiny if you take the right precautions. Dont drink any water except sealed bottled. Dont eat fruit, be sensible where you eat and dont have ice in drinks. Get the right shots and you will be fine. India is a fantastic place to visit. I go two or three times a year all over the country both in the big cities and the country. It is super safe and full of interest and charm and you will find little difficulty finding someone who speaks English. Also the infrastructure, cleanliness etc has improved dramatically since my first visit in the 90s. I dont know about US citizens but as a Brit I can get a multiple entry tourist visa online in 2 days for minimal cost
I can also recommend Burkina Faso as a friendly and interesting place to visit, as long as you head west out of Ouagadougou (it's iffy to head east or north). Big on music and culture, and not as religious as its surrounding countries to the north.
Shocked eritrea is not on it (guessing it might by Ethiopians crossing over) and that Ethiopia and Tanzania are. I guess I should’ve known cuz of the huge populations but they’re touristy for African standards.
I wonder how does Guinea appear so low on this list - it doesn't have a particularly high population and I don't know why it would be visited so much less than other West African countries
This quiz was tricky for me, because most of the places my mind went to were the no data countries, which just threw my whole thought process into chaos.
This isn't a very fulfilling quiz TBH, since the major countries you expect to see on the list can't be included on the list. Not much that can be done about it, that's just how it is...
India isn't isolated geographically at all.
Otherwise the rest of arguments make sense to me, especially considering population
Today, relations with India are kinda mixed. There are occasional tensions due to water-sharing agreements and border disputes, and Modi is not very popular among the majority Muslim population of Bangladesh. At the same time, Indian cultural influence is abundant (especially with Bollywood movies/music) and the two countries are very economically integrated with each other. Also, the current PM is the daughter of Sheikh Mujib, so she has pursued many of her father's policies. While relations aren't always great, I'd say India is on better terms with Bangladesh than most of its other neighbors (especially Pakistan and China).
AND I advise everybody to come and visit here! Its a wondeful and unique place.
(To be fair though, population probably has a lot to do with it. I'm guessing Bangladesh would fare better than many countries on this list if it were based on absolute numbers of tourists)
T/P = Tourists / Population
Afghanistan: 0,00062 T/P
Equatorial Guinea: 0,00442 T/P
Gabon: 0,12382 T/P
Libya: 0,00495 T/P
Mauritania: 0,00736 T/P
North Korea: 0,00039 T/P
Somalia: 0,00003 T/P
South Sudan: 0,00043
Syria: 0,28970 T/P
Turkmenistan: 0,00136 T/P
Yemen: 0,01229 T/P
Source: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fwa0toRgAk-ZTe1dysUk8weBWS1jOD29AkYvtIOnYls/edit?usp=sharing