Pretty rude and unnecessary of you to assume the commenter purposely misspelled quizzes. They got their point across, typos happen, and you clearly understood what they were saying. (Just while we're at it :) )
I forgot Nauru, even though I've been there and saw that Nauruans generally won't work -- they import Gilbert Islanders to do the phosphate mining for them, and collect the royalties (like the Gulf Arabs prominent on this list).
Nauru is largely broke, and since 2001 has been used for the internment of refugees dumped there by Australia. There are about 1700 refugees held on Nauru as of March 2018, in deplorable conditions.
Thanks for those comments and links. I knew next to nothing about Nauru before. Just read a few articles beginning with the ones you linked to and will be reading more. What a tragic history and present state of affairs, on many levels.
It's an insult to the people who continue live in countries with high levels of emigration to suggest the false dilemma that the only choices in their country are suicide or leaving. Some people actually try to improve their own situation rather than eternally running away from problems they themselves were likely complicit in creating.
Sorry but nobody has an overland border with Australia. Nobody is trying to seek asylum in Australia because it's their only option; they're trying to go to Australia in particular because it's a rich country with high wages and benefits. Probably they're transiting through other safe countries and opting to continue on to Australia because they don't want to live the rest of their life in Indonesia, even though it's safe for them there. I still understand sympathy, but realistically the alternative is not "Australia or being murdered." It's "Australia or living in a developing country."
I'm kicking myself so hard now for trying literally every small Caribbean other then Antigua... I also tried a few Oceanian nations and when they didn't work, I just figured that people didn't want to move to those places so I skipped the rest.
Nice quiz! :) I tried all the top immigrant destination countries first, then realised that these smaller nations would have a far higher proportion of foreign born residents, even though more people overall immigrate to the larger countries. Clever little trick there!
In a historical sense, yes. In a currently popular political strategic talking-point, yes. In a mathematical reality, not even close. The Migration Policy Institute estimated about 13.5% for the year 2016.
You might want to replace Canada with the Netherlands, since 22,6% of the population is a migrant. This is the (official) source but it is in Dutch haha: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/37296ned/table?dl=107C4.
There are only a couple dozen women living in Vatican City at any given time. Like 95% of the people who live there are men (most of whom are celibate).
Yes, all people holding Vatican citizenship are immigrants.
They can't be born there because the citizenship is conferred to men only*, and that only for a limited time (unless you're the Pope), i.e. ius offici.
This means you can only get Vatican citizenship if the Pope wants you to work there, basically - and you only hold that citizenship during your stay there.
*Women married to men working there sometimes can also get citizenship if the Pope feels like it during their stay, but that's not guaranteed. Since most men permanently living there are clergy of some sort and have to be celibate anyway, this rarely occurs.
What I really want for these quizzes is someone to give birth to a baby boy right in the center of St Peters Basilica and raise him to be a cardinal so that the answer to the Vatican is like "99.6% are foreign born- everyone except ol' Girolamo"
Short history of Nauru, Australia's dumping ground for refugees
Australians demand end to Nauru refugee centres
RIP Australia
RIP New Zealand
RIP Canada
RIP Luxembourg
RIP Europe
It was a good run
They can't be born there because the citizenship is conferred to men only*, and that only for a limited time (unless you're the Pope), i.e. ius offici.
This means you can only get Vatican citizenship if the Pope wants you to work there, basically - and you only hold that citizenship during your stay there.
*Women married to men working there sometimes can also get citizenship if the Pope feels like it during their stay, but that's not guaranteed. Since most men permanently living there are clergy of some sort and have to be celibate anyway, this rarely occurs.