I looked into Mt. Etna being the most deadly eruption, because I was always under the impression that it was a fairly safe volcano as far as volcanoes go. The event in 1169 was deadly because of an earthquake/tsunami. Only a few sources refer to an eruption from Etna, and it seems as though no eruption at all actually took place. I'm not sure which eruption actually was the deadliest though.
Here in Italy we say that Mt Etna is a friendly volcano cause the lava always goes the opposite direction compared to where the towns and villages are. At least that's what they always told me as a kid. On the other hand Mt Vesuvius is much more dangerous, the government has a plan ready in case the volcano erupts and hits the city of Naples (one of the most populous of the country) so that its population can be equally divided between all the Italian regions and then migrate there
I think it's good to have it specified. For consistency, Hawaii could also be classed as an overseas region, but.....no one would get France if it wasn't clear.
Have 1900 people been killed by volcanoes in New Zealand since 141 BC? I doubt it. Also, does this count deaths by falling into volcanic hot springs, boiling mud, and fumaroles?
Not their biggest fan (often used without good reason, when there is no way you can accidentally guess one of the other answers), but this quiz could benefit from a yellow box. I got 15/15 by guessing and if I am honest, I could have only answered you 2 with 100% certainty (vesuvius and ararat). The rest I got by looking at the languages, and by naming countries known for volcanic activity (so usually without a specific question in mind)
Missed three Central American countries because I thought I had already guessed them. But that was on the previous quiz I took, about floods. *facepalm*
I'm surprised not to see any of the East African Rift countries in here. According to Polish Wikipedia article, Nyiragongo's 1977 eruption alone killed around 2000 people, although the English one doesn't mention such high numbers.
Iceland makes the list despite being far less populated than Africa.
I guess it's about keeping the written record, the actual number of casualties must have been big enough for a few African countries to make the list IMO but there isn't sufficient evidence or something. That's the only way I can explain it.
Just wondering, how did people estimate the number of people who died from Ilopango? I can't imagine there are very good population records of El Salvador (or anywhere really) from that time.
I guess it's about keeping the written record, the actual number of casualties must have been big enough for a few African countries to make the list IMO but there isn't sufficient evidence or something. That's the only way I can explain it.