Biggie - you of all people should know that words have the power to hypnotize, which is not an appropriate for the development of conscious political actors.
@BiggieSmalls, I have a faster way to get a answer, or just hear it right here from this quote, “The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer.”
It is the current American English (maybe other forms of English) idiom for coup d'etat. Once upon a time, you had to say the full term, because coup de grace was more used. In the Cold War period, US and Soviet activity made coup d'etats (not the correct French plural, I believe, but the correct English idiomatic one) so common that coup came to mean coup d'etat.
It's the current American idiot idiom for a legal matter put to a vote as provided in the United States Constitution. Then when the vote goes strictly along party lines and the issue is defeated, instead of claiming partisan trickery as they did when the process was started they call it democracy. According to many fools there are attempted coups (by vote) every day in the U.S.
I'm guessing it refers to a leader already being in power legitimately but executing a coup in order to remove democratic opposition or consolidate power as a dictator. The example of the Reza Shah Pahlavi in 1953 comes to mind as an example. He already was the Shah -- but with help from the military (and the CIA), he got rid of the democratically elected prime minister, Mossadegh.
Fujimori above is also an example. Democratically elected president who decided to "temporary dissolve" congress at some point. Napoleon III - elected French president who later declared himself emperor. Alexander I of Yugoslavia became king as heir to his father in constitutional/parliamentary monarchy but in 1929 abolished the constitution. Possibly also his son, Peter II, who was already a king as a minor, though his uncle was ruling as a regent, then declared himself of age at 17.
It's Mobutu, not Seko. He changed the name of Congo to Zaire only in 1971. And his own name from Joseph-Desiré Mobutu to Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbendu Wa Za Banga in 1972. The man was genuinely crazy.
The term suggests succession by an exception to the rule of law, a difficult concept when and where no such thing was effectively in place. And as much as we hate to admit it, Hitler came to power in a free and fair election. (Of course, what happened thereafter is another story.)
Thought the answer would be Zaire for Mobutu, although I realize it was Congo before and after him, but it seems like it should be an acceptable answer.
He wasn't directly elected but his appointment was legit under the Weimar constitution, and he assumed office as the leader of a parliamentary coalition.
It took me ages to get 'my own' William of Orange. For us Dutch William (Willem van Oranje) (1533-1584) is the Father of the Fatherland and responsible for the uprising against the evil king of Spain.
Is it not possible that the Quizmaster puts William III of Orange in the quiz?
Good quiz, but why are Pakistan and Germany both listed twice? It might be fun to add more variety by replacing the second Germany and Pakistan ones with other countries
53 seconds used, fun quiz. Was about to ask if Hitler's (among others) counts because it was a failed coup and he was democratically elected later, but I see the caveats
-Cunningham’s Law
Got William III muddled with William of Orange in spanish netherlands 1500's and couldn't work out for the life of me what I was getting wrong!
Idi, Idi, Idi Amin!
:)
please though, please accept Zaire for Congo.
Is it not possible that the Quizmaster puts William III of Orange in the quiz?