Yep, Antarctica is 100% wrong. The first people known to have gone to Antarctica in the sense of the area south of the Antarctic Circle were James Cook and his crew in 1773. John Davis, a sealer of New Haven Connecticut likely became the first person to set foot on the Antarctic mainland, though the claim is disputed. Amundsen himself first went to Antarctica in 1897, long before his successful Polar Expedition.
My comment no longer makes sense as you changed your name from "FidelCastro" to "PatoPotato"... put the word out conspiracy theorists: Castro is still alive and has adopted the alias Mr. Potato.
I may not agree with England, English or even Great Britain, the entire empire was the United Kingdom which should certainly be an acceptable answer. In fact, by the classical definition, an empire is ruled by an emperor/empress, so United Kingdom would be even more accurate, if less commonly used terminology.
Queen Victoria created herself Empress of India, and the title was passed down until King George VI and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother were the last Emperor and Empress of India. The British Empire was ruled by an Emperor/Empress.
Yeah, it's not really a big deal, but I was thinking the exact same thing. It just seems like the progression should be oldest to most recent, descending.
1920 - could you also accept "temperance?" I got stuck on that and could not come up with the right word, but are they not synonymous terms for the era?
Temperance was the name of the movement to ban alcohol, which preceded Prohibition (when it actually became illegal to make or sell alcohol) by some time. So while they are definitely related, they aren't synonymous.
Rewriting historical facts after the fact is like being a Monday Morning Quarterback.
Helps me to remember that I was in Yerevan for the 100th anniversary and they had "1915" banners hanging up all over the city.