I'm guessing the questions were changed somewhere in the last 5 years. Otherwise... you got Michael Jordan because you thought Iraq invaded him in 1990?
Yes, this was a pretty good quiz on the whole but for me the 1993 question let it down. Were there really no events of greater historical moment that year?
And was never officially abolished in Alabama(methinks) until 2012 when an error in the movie "Lincoln" provoked a look into the abolition processes of every state.
I think you mean Mississippi. Alabama ratifed the 13th Amendment on 12/2/1865, putting it among the original 27 states, or 3/4ths, necessary to pass it.. Mississippi failed to ratify it until 2013.
That's debatable. More accurate would be to say he lost by one state, and the electoral votes that it represented (25, putting Gore behind by 5 electoral votes). He still won the popular vote by over half a million votes. Maybe the clue could be rewritten "this candidate loses his bid to become US president by only getting 543,985 more votes than his opponent (at last tally)."
If we were a pure democracy and voting was required of every citizen by law rather than a democratic republic where voting is optional and the electoral college actually elects our president, one has to wonder how the course of our US history might have changed.
the two political parties would probably look different than they do. Republicans can only win elections at a national level by relying on higher voter turnout amongst scared/retired conservatives than apathetic liberals, or by suppressing the vote of young people/minorities/women/inner city residents. If everyone had to vote they couldn't rely on this strategy and would have to adjust their strategy.
Weren't thousands of people excluded from the elections by the Republican government of Florida (more or less) to secure a Bush win that would turn out to be crucial because of the crappy American electoral system?
eh.... kinda. there were 1000s of lawyers representing both parties in Florida during and especially after the election. All were trying to gain any advantage they could for their candidate. Republican lawyers aggressively sought to discount some ballots in districts where they were recounting because in those voting districts, Gore was thought to be favored and had they done a comprehensive recount it probably would have meant more votes for Gore. So... they (mostly through legal means) sought to throw out certain ballots that were allegedly not clearly marked.. the ones with the famous "hanging chads" or "dimpled" chads meaning that the little paper square had not been neatly punched out of the card. There was also the famous butterfly ballot in one district where confused seniors had obviously *meant* to vote for Gore but ended up voting for Buchanan. And ultimately efforts to continue recounting were halted by the Supreme Court. Bush was still ahead at that point, so he "won."
and the electoral college works the way that it does by design. It's not supposed to be a direct democracy. So, it's not like the system failed or didn't work as it was supposed to. I think nonsensical, archaic, or unrepresentative would be better adjectives here than "crappy."
What's crappy is not so much the electoral college (which does have a reasoning behind it) but the actual vote-casting methods. With so many irregularities, unclear voting by design rather than through voters' fault etc etc, almost any European court/electoral commission would order a recount, or more likely a repeat election with these issues tackled. Also *hours* of waiting at poll stations like in some poor country???
There is without doubt enormous room for improvement when it comes to the American election process. Some of this has to do with the outdated electoral college; a lot of it has to do with other things. Unfortunately some in power have deemed it advantageous to their staying in power to either fail to address the problems that exist, or, in many cases, actively work to make them worse.
Here's the problem...the president and executive branch has too much power. The president is elected as a representative of the states. He presides over 50 states. Meanwhile, one of the houses of congress is comprised of people representing the individual districts. California has 1/8 of the entire house of representatives. When this system was created, the legislative branch was to be the most powerful with executive second and judicial a distant 3rd. Somehow 230 years later, the executive branch is most powerful, followed by judicial, then lastly legislative. Everything is backwards from its original design. That's why people lose their minds over a presidential election where he serves a maximum of 8 years, but are totally cool with people serving in congress for 30 years. Because he's got too much power.
The events that we more "senior" citizens have lived through really help to put our current events into a broader perspective. I was a senior in college in Miami for both the Liberty City riots and the Mariel boatlift. The boatlift resulted in about 125.000 Cuban immigrants coming to Florida. It included many former inmates from Cuban prisons and mental health facilities. The fact that we survived it kinda puts the 10,000 immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America with only a suspicion of some sort of criminal activity seem a little less scary.
No, CJD/vCJD should also be accepted too in my opinion. vCJD (almost universally referred to as CJD at the time, although strictly I think it is different) is the disease that humans can get after eating cows with BSE. Clearly the EU banned British beef to avoid people getting vCJD from eating beef contaminated with BSE.
Yes, CJD should be accepted. It stands for Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease and is the human disease that can be contracted by eating meat from animals infected with BSE (which is Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy). Mad Cow is just the popular term - strictly for BSE I think, but it tends to encompass both in how it's used in the media.
But in any case, the question is "the disease that caused the EU to ban imports of British beef", and I think CJD certainly fits that description as much if not more so than BSE.
My absolute favourite kind of quiz. I have such a poor grasp on specific years so it's great to revise.
I've also created quizzes on an event a year for both 1900-1950 and 1950-2000 if people are interested, though my clues aren't quite as streamlined as these.
Yes, the quaint sport of basketball. Such an odd American custom. Only a few people have ever heard of it. And whoever heard of Michael Jordan outside of the United States? Nobody, that's who. Just a completely random and unnecessary imposition to expect anyone to guess that one. And, even if you knew it, how could one even spell it? It's just such a strange and weird answer.
I have to say, as someone who hates the number of questions on US sports that us non-Americans get hit with, that I had no clue on this one, but guessed the most famous Basketball player I knew and ehhh hey presto.
In this case, the question may be bloody tricky for those of us who aren’t from North America, but it is very very easily guessed, so I have to side with Quizmaster on this one.
I would agree that MJ leaving basketball is a little obscure on a global level, but so is Tony Blair becoming a PM or a small-scale terrorist attack in Japan.
Can I just say, princess Diana wasn't really a celeb as such more a public figure although she was heading into that celebrity realm so I suppose you could call her celebrity...
Obviously. It was all the work of Bush who let the Atheist-Muslim-Jewish-Satanist-Pastafarian Obama spy on Donald Trump (who won every president election since he was born) by dropping chemtrails onto Trump Tower to assassinate Kennedy with help from the CIA, the KGB, the Cuban government, the second shooter on the grassy knoll, George Soros, and space aliens.
I understand why in this case (because they’re both in this specific quiz), but why is “MJ” never accepted as a type-in for Michael Jackson on this site? It always seems to work as a type-in for Michael Jordan, even though they’re both commonly referred to as MJ and Michael Jackson is SURELY the more famous of the two?
The USSR ceased to exist on 26th when it was voted out of existence by the Supreme Soviet. The 31st was when the UN officially recognized Russia as the legal successor state to the USSR.
1992 was easy enough to guess, but the wording should probably be changed. The correct answer was definitely not the only city to see riots after the Rodney King verdict. I was in San Francisco, for example, and personally witnessed looting, fires set, and even a trolley car overturned!
But in any case, the question is "the disease that caused the EU to ban imports of British beef", and I think CJD certainly fits that description as much if not more so than BSE.
I've also created quizzes on an event a year for both 1900-1950 and 1950-2000 if people are interested, though my clues aren't quite as streamlined as these.
In this case, the question may be bloody tricky for those of us who aren’t from North America, but it is very very easily guessed, so I have to side with Quizmaster on this one.
No, I'm not bitter...
I will shut up now.
Inside job
Fact
Good quiz ♥️
I typed MJ and got michael jordan but not michael jackson??