Stephen seems totally random. Nobody wanted to be named after him.
I can remember King John because he was played by some kind of a panther thing with a pet snake wearing a short, short cape in Robin Hood by Disney. Sir Hiss.
But it’s still inaccurate to call Edward VII a member of the House of Windsor, since the name was introduced by his successor George V and therefore didn’t exist during the reign of Edward VII.
Glad I'm not the only one! I stared at 1837-1901 for many seconds, remembering William preceded Victoria; Edward followed her, but.... Did get it before time ran out.
Freaking unimaginative lot, our "royal family". Only 13 different names in a millennium, and not as if the next three in line will change it (by which time, hopefully it'll disappear as the anachronism it is, but that's another story)
They can always choose a different name, like the previous king, known as Bertie. But looking around Europe this is out of fashion now, apart from the popes.
there are plenty of other monarchies in Europe. I'm a (British) republican but it's not something I feel really strongly about. It's rather a daft system but it does kind of work.
Henry VIII (Protestant) died and his son Edward (Protestant) became King.When he died, aged 15, in his will he stated his half-sister, Elizabeth (Protestant) was illegitimate, because even though she was born in wedlock, Henry VIII and Anne Bolyen's marriage had been annulled (it basically never happened...) and because Mary was a Catholic and he wanted to carry on the Protestant way of things, he wanted his cousin Jane (Protestant) to be Queen. But years before, his dad, Henry VIII and Parliament had brought a law in, the Act of Succession, that put Mary and Elizabeth in line behind his son Edward. the Treason Act made it an offence to interrupt that line of Succession, so what Edward wanted, he could not have without Parliament changing that law. Edward could cry "Jane" from the rooftops, but the Law said different. The Privy Council changed their collective mind, and declared Mary as Queen. Jane was never crowned.
Henry VIII wasn't a Protestant by the way – he never allowed any changes to church practices during his reign, but did allow an arrest warrant to be issued for his last wife because of her outspokenly Protestant views.
Agreed. Henry VIII was in fact a Catholic. When the Pope wouldn't allow the annulment of his (heirless) marriage to Catherine of Aragon it led to the English Reformation and separation from the authority of the Pope. The Church of England was formed, and Henry was thereafter Supreme Head of it. He never aligned himself with Protestantism per se, but posited a kind of mixture of Catholicism and Protestantism.
Not sure I'd call Henry a 'Protestant'. yes, he broke with Rome but not over any doctrinal issue. Essentially he wanted to be head of an English Catholic Church.
This still comes down to the current day with some sections of the CofE describing themselves as Catholics but not Roman Catholics.
Edward VII did not belong to the House of Windsor. He belonged to the House of Saxe-Coburg Gotha as indeed did his son George V until the name was changed to the less German sounding more patriotic Windsor during the First World War in 1916 or 1917...
I would love the same quiz but where you actually have to know each persons name like in the right order (in addition to this quiz which is also great)
Any chance of a one where you have to include the number also? This one is too easy :) I've been using this as a quiz for my 9 year old while in lockdown
Good quiz but it could be even better if one had to name them in order - too easy otherwise. The title of course is wrong - it should be English and British monarchs. And finally, Edward VII and George V were of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha until the latter changed the family name to Windsor in World War One...
Not quite. The Stuart monarchs up until Anne were not monarchs of Great Britain, they held both the English and Scottish crowns but they, at the time remained separate countries, just with a common crowned head.
Henry was the king for a bit, then he was taken off the throne and Edward was put on, then Henry got the throne back and then lost it again a year later, leading to Edward regaining power
I always thought it started with Egbert and the 2 dozen plus before William. Or are we just counting the French and German Monarchs? Alfred the Great may be upset.
That is a strange way of doing it though - England as a political entity existed before the Norman Conquest, so why do we often ignore those kings so often or that period in general. Other countries also don't have a cutoff based on when they were last invaded (France would have a very short history otherwise...! :-D )
Edward VII was *not* part of the House of Windsor. George V changed the family name in 1917, seven years after the death of Edward VII. He should be listed under the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Rest In Peace Her Majesty, Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Interesting to see that my points still remain since Charles has the same name as previous kings. And with William and George next in line, I probably won't see a differently named British monarch in my lifetime.
Depends on what name they decide on - they can choose any of their names as their official monarch name. So we could have an Arthur I, a Philip I, or a Louis I, potentially followed by an Alexander I or a Louis I or II...
Interesting there are only 9 names for 37 male monarchs and 4 names for only 6 females. Maybe they can start using modern naming trends and have a Queen Zandaryna or King Fyllip.
I thought "royal speculation" was that the former Prince Charles would never choose to reign as King Charles. But now he's done exactly that. Perhaps he figures he can wear the name better than his predecessors!
They had the “next in line” answer cued up for Charles III already, so it didn’t reset the answer stats or anything. Although… I wonder if the quizmaster predicted this was going to happen this year by having then Prince now King Charles in the quiz already.
Do you mind if I borrow this for an “all british and English monarchs ever” quiz going all the way back to Offa, the first ever monarch of England (later becoming Great Britain/UK)?
Screw the monarchy. They're using tax money to spend a party to say "yep, this guy is king now" instead of using it on anything in a cost of living crisis.
England existed before 1066 - please don't do that lazy thing of starting the list of English monarchs from the Norman Conquest - you're missing such an interesting period of history.
I can remember King John because he was played by some kind of a panther thing with a pet snake wearing a short, short cape in Robin Hood by Disney. Sir Hiss.
Edward the 8th was never crowned, and Elizabeth 2 became queen in 1952, but wasnt crowned until 1953
This still comes down to the current day with some sections of the CofE describing themselves as Catholics but not Roman Catholics.
In my country we have this presidential thing which seems to work, kind-a, sort-of, mostly
So this is incorrect
Therefore the title of the quiz is a little misleading.
Henry, Richard, John, oi!
Henry, Ed, Ed, Ed, Rich two
Then three more Henrys join our song
Edward, Edward, Rich the third
Henry, Henry, Ed again
Mary one, good Queen Bess
Jimmy, Charles and Charles and then
Jim, Will, Mary, Anna Gloria
George, George, George, George
Will, Victoria
Edward, George, Edward, George six
And Queen Liz two completes the mix
God Save The King
Sept. 2022
Rest in peace HM The Queen; God save the King.
The name didn't change until the reign of George V.
Edward VII was House Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/1847213/all-englishbritish-monarchs-ever